Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Who owns all these super lucrative nurseries in the UK?

73 replies

coxesorangepippin · 12/01/2024 14:34

Shameless thread about a thread

Almost 50k per year to send a child to nursery?

Brother used to pay £50 a day, that's up North, and 8 years ago now.

Who is taking the profit from all these nurseries?

OP posts:
NewName24 · 12/01/2024 19:30

There are some very odd myths being perpetuated on this thread

00100001 · 12/01/2024 19:51

NancyJoan · 12/01/2024 19:12

Owner of small chain of very nice nurseries local to me is absolutely raking it in. Own four kids at private school, amazing house, swish cars. There can be a lot of money in it.

You have no idea where that money is coming from though... Unless there's no other income for the house?

Monkeybutt1 · 12/01/2024 19:56

Owner of local nurseries in my area, owned by husband and wife so they are the only income, they live in a mansion he drives a very nice ferrari and their 2 kids go to private school.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

febbabies2023 · 12/01/2024 20:02

Our nursery is currently £85 a day and it's due to go up 10% in April (Kent)

We have two kids in full time which is costing us nearly 3k a month. We both have good jobs but wow I can see why a lot of women don't return to work after maternity

I'm sure there are reasons for the fees but it is painful every month sending someone that much money. Especially when it's nearly 3 times your bloody mortgage!

OhMehGoddess · 12/01/2024 20:08

PuttingDownRoots · 12/01/2024 15:49

The nursery my DDs attended was cheaper than the local childminders!!

This was the case for me too. With the hours we needed.

And we needed stability too, there is no cover if a child minder is ill. And didn't have to worry about holidays either.

NancyJoan · 12/01/2024 20:15

00100001 · 12/01/2024 19:51

You have no idea where that money is coming from though... Unless there's no other income for the house?

I don’t know for sure, no. But have just looked on Companies House, and the company has pretax profits of £1.6m. The business premises are all owned by one of the two directors, who receives £475k in rent each year, so I think their lifestyle is due to the nursery business.

00100001 · 12/01/2024 21:10

Nice. I'm in the wrong business!

coxesorangepippin · 12/01/2024 21:12

£65 a day is easily £1200-1500 a month. If you're "only" earning £1950 a month it's a killer

^^

This. If you can't afford it, what do you do? Give up work?

Why isn't it subsidized? It's another elitist problem

OP posts:
00100001 · 12/01/2024 21:22

coxesorangepippin · 12/01/2024 21:12

£65 a day is easily £1200-1500 a month. If you're "only" earning £1950 a month it's a killer

^^

This. If you can't afford it, what do you do? Give up work?

Why isn't it subsidized? It's another elitist problem

It IS subsidised!!

You can get government help to pay 20%. Local councils help funding too. You get 15/30 hours funded care as well after a certain time.

And yeah... You (read women) give up work.

If you have twins and it costs you £2500 per month, and your household income is £3500 p/M What else can you do?

Yellowwellies1 · 12/01/2024 21:31

Government top up is only 2k per annum

thenightsky · 12/01/2024 21:37

How on earth do NHS workers on band 5 and below ever manage to have children in the London area? Must have a knock on effect on recruitment.

Hotterthanhades · 12/01/2024 21:54

jannier · 12/01/2024 19:15

Few childminders charge anything like that the average is more £5 to £6 and hour and funding rates are lower for 3 year olds.

But £100 a day is £10 a hour - not a million miles from £6 an hour ( obviously makes a difference to wages, but it’s not going to make a nursery owner a billionaire )

jannier · 12/01/2024 22:39

Hotterthanhades · 12/01/2024 21:54

But £100 a day is £10 a hour - not a million miles from £6 an hour ( obviously makes a difference to wages, but it’s not going to make a nursery owner a billionaire )

No I agree that's why all early years s settings are suffering closures, especially when funding is less than normal fees, but ratios are higher for nurseries so it's not a straight comparison

evelynevelyn · 12/01/2024 22:55

VolvoFan · 12/01/2024 15:05

Nurseries help generate economic output. You put your kids in nursery, you go off to work, you earn money, you pay tax, you pay for nursery etc it goes round in a circle. All you're doing is working to put your kids into nursery. All in all it's just another spreadsheet with numbers on it. Nothing else.

Well, that depends, right? If your work is not meaningful and you earn just enough money to cover nursery, sure.

But if your work is inventing the Covid vaccine, it looks different. Or simply if it provides you with meaning, or helps others, or earns a big enough surplus to spend on other things that are important for any number of reasons, it's different.

Let's not write off nursery work as useless quite yet.

bananamangoes · 13/01/2024 07:17

£50k a year?

That's £200 a day

Nah. Not
Typical

FlatWhiteExtraHot · 13/01/2024 15:24

Fetchthevet · 12/01/2024 19:00

I don't understand this attitude, sorry. Surely your child is the most important / precious person in your life, and it's worth paying people well to look after and socialise them? I see a lot of people complaining about child care costs on this site, but I think good childcarers are worth their weight in gold.

Exactly, and I bet none of them would work for minimum wage!

FlatWhiteExtraHot · 13/01/2024 15:29

evelynevelyn · 12/01/2024 22:55

Well, that depends, right? If your work is not meaningful and you earn just enough money to cover nursery, sure.

But if your work is inventing the Covid vaccine, it looks different. Or simply if it provides you with meaning, or helps others, or earns a big enough surplus to spend on other things that are important for any number of reasons, it's different.

Let's not write off nursery work as useless quite yet.

Did you mean to be such a crashing snob?

Everyone’s work is “meaningful” even the scum on minimum wage 🙄. You’d soon be complaining if there were no waiting staff in your favourite restaurants or your bins didn’t get emptied or your supermarket delivery didn’t turn up.

GuinnessBird · 13/01/2024 15:31

FlatWhiteExtraHot · 13/01/2024 15:29

Did you mean to be such a crashing snob?

Everyone’s work is “meaningful” even the scum on minimum wage 🙄. You’d soon be complaining if there were no waiting staff in your favourite restaurants or your bins didn’t get emptied or your supermarket delivery didn’t turn up.

I agree with you.

I don't think the snobs realise just how many important jobs are minimum wage.

evelynevelyn · 13/01/2024 16:49

I absolutely agree. A job being meaningful and a job being well-paid are two very different things.

I clearly expressed myself badly if I managed to covey almost the opposite of my point Smile

If one's job is neither meaningful nor well-paid (two different things) then I can see why, like the poster I was replying to, it might seem pointless going out to work just to pay that out to a nursery ("just another spreadsheet with numbers on, nothing else"). I disagree though.

I don't think childcare is "nothing else". It is both a meaningful and important job in its own right, and a crucial enabler to much of the rest of the world of work. Which, whether well-paid or not, is where a lot of valuable stuff happens, stuff that is meaningful to the people who can stay in work, and those who rely upon them, and those (like the Covid vaccine example) who benefit from the efforts of countless working women, and men, some of whom could not have have done that work without childcare arrangements.

thenightsky · 13/01/2024 20:35

GuinnessBird · 13/01/2024 15:31

I agree with you.

I don't think the snobs realise just how many important jobs are minimum wage.

I posted earlier about NHS workers on band 4 or 5 or below. They do vital jobs and outpatient clinics would not run without them. So the NHS would be fucked pretty much.

FlyingSoap · 13/01/2024 20:42

thenightsky · 12/01/2024 21:37

How on earth do NHS workers on band 5 and below ever manage to have children in the London area? Must have a knock on effect on recruitment.

Or anywhere else in the UK. This is us. We are TTC but probably going to be one and done. Don’t see how we will afford it twice.

Breakingpoint1961 · 13/01/2024 20:54

@thenightsky I was that B3 NHS worker with 2 kids and single parent..luckily quite a few years ago, mortgage not extortionate, and frugal living, would not be able to do it now with mortgage amounts/rates..downright impossible!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread