Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

If your area was flooded, did your phone get an emergency alert?

21 replies

Shyandhiding · 28/10/2023 14:09

I haven’t heard anyone say they got one, but isn’t this what it was for?

OP posts:
bullseyeboat · 28/10/2023 14:14

Mine are switched off, but as I said at the time this was discussed on here; we knew about the risks from mainstream media anyway.

The met office provided the warnings and the very single news outlet known to man shared it.

We had council workers etc going door to door trying to evacuate people from a local town before it flooded.

I do not see how an alert from the government would have made much of a difference tbh

Ratfinkstinkypink · 28/10/2023 14:16

Our area was hit hard but I don't know of anyone that got an alert (East Anglia)

CloudyAgain · 28/10/2023 14:42

Good point. No.

YourNameGoesHere · 28/10/2023 14:47

I know a lot of people who were flooded, a significant amount of our local area was under water and not one person got an alert. Which is bloody ridiculous as it's the first example listed on the emergency alert page explaining it's purpose.

I wonder if it's actually been used since the test anywhere? I suspect not and it's just another waste of money.

Shyandhiding · 28/10/2023 17:20

YourNameGoesHere · 28/10/2023 14:47

I know a lot of people who were flooded, a significant amount of our local area was under water and not one person got an alert. Which is bloody ridiculous as it's the first example listed on the emergency alert page explaining it's purpose.

I wonder if it's actually been used since the test anywhere? I suspect not and it's just another waste of money.

That is really ridiculous. What was the point of it all!

OP posts:
OldTinHat · 28/10/2023 17:36

No. No phone alert here.

YourNameGoesHere · 28/10/2023 17:44

Shyandhiding · 28/10/2023 17:20

That is really ridiculous. What was the point of it all!

I really have no idea. It seems completely pointless having it at all if it's not going to be used for the purpose they claimed it would be used for as claimed in the screenshot of the website.

I also had a quick Google and apparently it's estimated to cost approximately £25 MILLION for just the first 3 years!! So a humongous waste of money if it's not actually doing what it claimed it would do.

If your area was flooded, did your phone get an emergency alert?
Bringonthesunforthewashing · 28/10/2023 17:53

No alerts here

gotomomo · 28/10/2023 17:56

The issue with flooding is that it is very localised. The mobile phone alert can only be restricted to a certain mast - if everyone in that sector got an evacuate message it would potentially clog up street's further away from the danger zone so those on most immediate harm can't get away. There are exceptions eg a dam likely to burst but in most cases flooding will be restricted to a handful of houses, a few streets at most not most of a town

gotomomo · 28/10/2023 17:57

Because it's not many houses, it's officials go house to house, they can then organise help if necessary

WaitingfortheTardis · 28/10/2023 17:59

I'm still waiting for the test one...

YourNameGoesHere · 28/10/2023 18:00

gotomomo · 28/10/2023 17:57

Because it's not many houses, it's officials go house to house, they can then organise help if necessary

That depends though doesn't it. In some of the areas I know which were flooded it absolutely wasn't just not many houses where people could go house to house to help, it was several hundreds of houses, community buildings, shops and stables etc.

JIGNAJAY · 28/10/2023 18:07

No alert here and pretty bad floods, however I wonder if the emergency alerts would be more suitable for significant threat to life. The North Sea flood killed over 500 people in the UK. The Sheffield dam disaster (1800s) killed nearly 300 (though not sure an emergency alert would have been quick enough). A few other floods in recent (ish) history where thousands have lost homes and dozens have died. I'm not sure the floods last week quite warranted evacuation or mass texts being sent out.

1wokeuplikethis · 28/10/2023 18:07

Because it’s only going to be used for a nuclear threat.

skilpadde · 28/10/2023 18:07

gotomomo · 28/10/2023 17:57

Because it's not many houses, it's officials go house to house, they can then organise help if necessary

In Brechin, 350 homes were given notice to evacuate before the river breached the flood barrier.

I can't imagine door to door contact would be faster than a much-publicised emergency text service. Going door to door should only complement a faster alert, not be a primary means of communication.

skilpadde · 28/10/2023 18:12

JIGNAJAY · 28/10/2023 18:07

No alert here and pretty bad floods, however I wonder if the emergency alerts would be more suitable for significant threat to life. The North Sea flood killed over 500 people in the UK. The Sheffield dam disaster (1800s) killed nearly 300 (though not sure an emergency alert would have been quick enough). A few other floods in recent (ish) history where thousands have lost homes and dozens have died. I'm not sure the floods last week quite warranted evacuation or mass texts being sent out.

Evacuation was warranted and did happen in Scotland when it became clear that hundreds of homes were going to be flooded.

And while the emergency text service was originally tested nationally, it doesn't have to be delivered on a mass scale. It can be delivered locally, or at least we were told it can be when they were seeking to justify having spent millions of pounds on it.

JIGNAJAY · 28/10/2023 18:17

skilpadde · 28/10/2023 18:12

Evacuation was warranted and did happen in Scotland when it became clear that hundreds of homes were going to be flooded.

And while the emergency text service was originally tested nationally, it doesn't have to be delivered on a mass scale. It can be delivered locally, or at least we were told it can be when they were seeking to justify having spent millions of pounds on it.

I read that 400 homes were evacuated. It could be more now I have no idea. Could an emergency alert be that localised? Genuine question.

YourNameGoesHere · 28/10/2023 18:37

1wokeuplikethis · 28/10/2023 18:07

Because it’s only going to be used for a nuclear threat.

If there's a nuclear threat what good is a bloody emergency alert going to be... Hmm

i like a previous poster was under the illusion it could be localised, surely if that's not the case then there is little to no use having the system in the first place.

Dotcheck · 28/10/2023 18:51

Shyandhiding · 28/10/2023 17:20

That is really ridiculous. What was the point of it all!

It’s for when the aliens invade.

Obvs.

Shyandhiding · 28/10/2023 22:25

Dotcheck · 28/10/2023 18:51

It’s for when the aliens invade.

Obvs.

Or the Zombies!

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page