Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

So now all I need to do is save up 300K--is this for real?

540 replies

Coffeetree · 30/08/2023 07:35

An article from This Is Money showed up on my feed this morning. Basically someone with £290K in pension pots at 50 years old, asking whether they're on the right track for retirement. The rest of the article was various investment advice. Generally the advice was "You're nearly there."

I read these articles and I feel like someone is playing a joke on me. I usually feel very very privileged in that, at 52, I have a mortgage that I'll hopefully be able to pay off in 4 years, plus about £50K in pensions. No inheritances on the horizon. I've worked in charities my whole life, then became single about five years ago, hence not much saved.

So, after paying off my mortgage, I then need to buckle down and save up 300K? That's not going to happen. My plan is to keep working and then go part-time or contract when I reach retirement age.

Am I the only one who thinks these "retirement advice" articles are really out-of-touch?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
Dahlia57 · 01/09/2023 06:42

We have now reached retirement age. The mortgage was repaid years ago and we do have quite good savings although we only had very modest jobs. We have small occupational pensions and around £800 each from the government. We can manage ok with this but if one of us should pass the household income would be a lot less but all the household bills would be much the same so that's when the income would be difficult to pay for everything without having to resort to savings. Also should one of us need to go into care and this is likely as husband suffers from dementia, care home costs would be £3k minimum pm. So income and savings would need to cover this then it would be the house. I've worked for 50 years, mostly full time and my husband close to 50 years as well. Our children may receive little or no inheritance.

R4ID · 01/09/2023 06:49

Can someone help me here. I’ve gone onto the Vanguard Calculator and put in

Starting with a zero balance pension pot
Saving £1000 a month into the pot for 27 years (age 40-67) so contributing a total of £324,000 at medium growth rate of 5% only gives me a pot of £373,000??

That doesn’t seem like a lot of growth.

Is there a better way than this to invest £1000 a month?

Coffeetree · 01/09/2023 06:58

Yeah that doesn't sound right.

I couldn't find the calculator you're referring to. I would plug those same figures into a compound interest calculator (I know pensions don't have interest rates but growth rates! But the figures will work out the same. Give a conservative rate like 4%.)

OP posts:

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

R4ID · 01/09/2023 07:04

Coffeetree · 01/09/2023 06:58

Yeah that doesn't sound right.

I couldn't find the calculator you're referring to. I would plug those same figures into a compound interest calculator (I know pensions don't have interest rates but growth rates! But the figures will work out the same. Give a conservative rate like 4%.)

https://www.vanguardinvestor.co.uk/what-we-offer/personal-pension/pension-calculator

Vanguard Asset Management | Personal Investing in the UK

https://www.vanguardinvestor.co.uk/what-we-offer/personal-pension/pension-calculator

Teateaandmoretea · 01/09/2023 07:06

R4ID · 01/09/2023 06:49

Can someone help me here. I’ve gone onto the Vanguard Calculator and put in

Starting with a zero balance pension pot
Saving £1000 a month into the pot for 27 years (age 40-67) so contributing a total of £324,000 at medium growth rate of 5% only gives me a pot of £373,000??

That doesn’t seem like a lot of growth.

Is there a better way than this to invest £1000 a month?

The problem is that you don’t know what the growth is.

Both of my pensions have performed better than that, but I noticed yesterday one is in a high risk fund.

The main advantage of pensions over other types of saving is the tax and that your employer contributes. That’s what makes the biggest difference. Not absolutely sure what to do about that tbh now I’m getting older. But then on my investment ISA the lowest risk one apparently is the one that’s lost money!

Actual interest on savings is absolutely rubbish anyway, compound or not. It is usually less than inflation so your money is just eroded.

Richmondgal · 01/09/2023 07:14

RosaGallica · 30/08/2023 07:41

Sign of the inequality of our times and who the country is run for (clue: not for anyone who works for a living).

It is your responsibility to provide for your old age as I have done by foregoing holidays expensive cars etc

R4ID · 01/09/2023 07:22

Coffeetree · 01/09/2023 06:58

Yeah that doesn't sound right.

I couldn't find the calculator you're referring to. I would plug those same figures into a compound interest calculator (I know pensions don't have interest rates but growth rates! But the figures will work out the same. Give a conservative rate like 4%.)

I put the figures into a compound interest calculator and it’s come out with a pot of 581,818 😰 had a mild (massive) panic there when I saw the vanguard figures!!!

Heatherbell1978 · 01/09/2023 07:22

R4ID · 01/09/2023 06:49

Can someone help me here. I’ve gone onto the Vanguard Calculator and put in

Starting with a zero balance pension pot
Saving £1000 a month into the pot for 27 years (age 40-67) so contributing a total of £324,000 at medium growth rate of 5% only gives me a pot of £373,000??

That doesn’t seem like a lot of growth.

Is there a better way than this to invest £1000 a month?

Assuming that £1000 is after the 25% tax has been added by the government so your actual contribution is £800 per month? Or if you have £1000 to contribute then the amount going in will be £1,250 a month. You won't get 25% interest in a savings account.

R4ID · 01/09/2023 07:28

Heatherbell1978 · 01/09/2023 07:22

Assuming that £1000 is after the 25% tax has been added by the government so your actual contribution is £800 per month? Or if you have £1000 to contribute then the amount going in will be £1,250 a month. You won't get 25% interest in a savings account.

Yes the 1000 a month is including my contribution, employers contribution and tax relief. It’s the total amount going into the pot each month.

Teateaandmoretea · 01/09/2023 07:39

R4ID · 01/09/2023 07:22

I put the figures into a compound interest calculator and it’s come out with a pot of 581,818 😰 had a mild (massive) panic there when I saw the vanguard figures!!!

You won’t get 5% interest a year. For most of the 10’s you were lucky to get 1-2%. Plus you have to pay tax on it.

R4ID · 01/09/2023 07:42

Teateaandmoretea · 01/09/2023 07:39

You won’t get 5% interest a year. For most of the 10’s you were lucky to get 1-2%. Plus you have to pay tax on it.

This is 4%

underneaththeash · 01/09/2023 07:45

RosaGallica · 30/08/2023 07:55

The super-rich do not get there by working, don’t be ridiculous. Nor do the moderately rich who live by landlording and getting other people to buy houses for them. In a country where it is now known that you can’t get into ‘hard and boring’ jobs without family connections, can’t buy a house in most of the country without family connections, and have to pay through the nose in training to get even a median level job (therefore largely inaccessible without family support), wealth is not earned nor earn-able when you start off in life with nothing. Jane Austen needs to be put back on school curricula as a textbook for life studies, especially for girls.

We're not super rich, but we have that easily in pensions, through working.

DH grew up in a council flat.

treacledan71 · 01/09/2023 07:46

People that have good work pensions don't realise how lucky they are . I work public service the last 5 years and won't retire for 15 years when 67 and my work and I contribute a lot per month but still won't be loads but I am very lucky. I do have a small pot private pension from other jobs too. Before I worked here I got the standard compulsory 2 per cent or whatever it was. As I said people with good pensions that have worked public service and a like since young are lucky.

gillygeey · 01/09/2023 07:48

DH grew up in a council flat.

try getting one of those now!

Sceptic1234 · 01/09/2023 08:24

VanGoghsDog · 31/08/2023 22:00

Oh god - again, for the hard of understanding: THERE IS NO INTEREST ON PENSIONS, so interest compounding is irrelevant.

There is no interest, but a properly managed pension fund should crystallize gains due to growth in share prices etc by transferring funds from shares etc, which can go up and down, to things such as bonds which give a defined return. The closer you get to retirement, the more the fund should be weighted towards safer assets.

This means that a properly managed fund should see sustained exponential growth exactly like an interest bearing account. All of this is buried within the overall value of the fund.

Every fund I have ever looked at shows growth achieved previously, along with a disclaimer saying that past performance is not a guaruntee of future growth. With the exception of funds specifically linked to particular markets, they all advertise themselves as being able to achieve sustained growth, without offering any guaruntee.

Teateaandmoretea · 01/09/2023 08:31

R4ID · 01/09/2023 07:42

This is 4%

Okay you won’t get 4% for the next 30 or whatever years either. Interest rates are currently high. Not in comparison to the 70s but we aren’t going back to that.

Currently interest rates are also lower than inflation so the money is actually losing value in savings accounts.

VanGoghsDog · 01/09/2023 08:32

The closer you get to retirement, the more the fund should be weighted towards safer assets.

This is outdated advice with the 'new' flexible drawdown options.

At age 67, assuming you retire then, you still have to fund maybe 20-30 years. Why would you not want most of your fund still in growth stocks fir a lot of that time?

You only need to move a years worth of pension per year across to safer assets, like bonds and cash. Let the rest continue working.

And if you retire earlier, as many people do, it's obviously even longer.

Teateaandmoretea · 01/09/2023 08:35

Sceptic1234 · 01/09/2023 08:24

There is no interest, but a properly managed pension fund should crystallize gains due to growth in share prices etc by transferring funds from shares etc, which can go up and down, to things such as bonds which give a defined return. The closer you get to retirement, the more the fund should be weighted towards safer assets.

This means that a properly managed fund should see sustained exponential growth exactly like an interest bearing account. All of this is buried within the overall value of the fund.

Every fund I have ever looked at shows growth achieved previously, along with a disclaimer saying that past performance is not a guaruntee of future growth. With the exception of funds specifically linked to particular markets, they all advertise themselves as being able to achieve sustained growth, without offering any guaruntee.

There isn’t sustained exponential growth. It goes up one year then stays the same the next, then falls. You basically own units which go up or down. You also have to pay a percentage each year.

The previous gains have been based on economic growth. So it depends what happens in the future. All the projections are based on historical data.

VanGoghsDog · 01/09/2023 09:46

Teateaandmoretea · 01/09/2023 08:35

There isn’t sustained exponential growth. It goes up one year then stays the same the next, then falls. You basically own units which go up or down. You also have to pay a percentage each year.

The previous gains have been based on economic growth. So it depends what happens in the future. All the projections are based on historical data.

Exactly. You could literally lose it all, down to zero. There are no guarantees (unless it is a scheme with guarantees, but they are rare now because, funnily enough, the providers went bust - Equitable Life for example).

In Feb 2020 I bought a couple of funds in my ISA, one was Scottish Mortgage. I recall looking at the stock components and thinking I didn't have much in those areas so it was a good addition.

In late Feb, and then onwards, the world went into freefall. Nearly all of my stocks lost money, my funds really suffered, including my pension investments.

But Scottish Mortgage.....that increased by over 100%! How smart am I! (Clue, not smart at all). Turns out it has (had) holdings in Zoom, Amazon, etc. It's a tech fund (which was probably why I chose it, I don't hold any individual tech stocks).

I didn't need the cash, and it was holding up my portfolio, so I left it (if I'd sold it, what would I do with the money, buy more stocks?). It obviously went back down gradually and now, three and a half years later, it is 'only' around 10% up, but it has thrown off some dividends too.

The other one is currently down 19%, but that's because it's a high yield fund and it gives me large dividends four times a year.

A rollercoaster. NOT "exponential growth" (people don't know what exponential means to be frank).

Coffeetree · 01/09/2023 10:18

Yes, that's exactly true and a pension can absolutely disappear, but that message sometimes scares people off pensions unnecessarily. High-risk investments are a bad idea for amateurs but a good tracker fund, historically, will have solid yields over the decades.

Some of my funds had negative yields in 2008 and in 2020 but in the long run they've performed well.

OP posts:
PerspicaciaTick · 01/09/2023 10:36

I'm not sure if it has already been mentioned, but one of the simplest and most cost effective things you can do is to ensure that you are getting as many years credit for your state pension as possible.
Check your personal state pension entitlement online, it will show you how many years you have built up and any gaps. Depending on when the gaps happened, you may be able to pay a relatively small amount to cover the gaps and get credit for those years and ensure you get the full state pension if you can.

CaveMum · 01/09/2023 10:59

If anyone is interested, a new podcast has launched called The Rest is Money, hosted by Steph McGovern and Robert Peston.

Interesting discussion in the final 15/20mins or so of the first episode about the British stock market and pension funds.

michalwave · 01/09/2023 11:05

VanGoghsDog · 30/08/2023 17:58

Everyone's circumstances are different. I have no partner, no kids, no mortgage, a high salary plus bonus, and my own business which earns another c£10-12k pa (I can take dividends, or pay into pension, or as I am now just let the money build up and use it as salary in future).

After my 38.5% I still take home over £3k. I couldn't put all of my bonus in this time because it would take me over the £60k so I had to earn some which means this month I've taken home over £4k.

The downsides, other than bringing home less ....well, you can't access it until you're 55 (I am now 55) so if you might need it that's unhelpful.
There's always the risk that the govt might change the rules and suddenly tax you more (but if you had saved tax initially you'd be no worse off than if they had taxed you at source, just pissed off I guess).
And if it's invested, investment risk too.

Upsides are massssive, imv. I stay under the 40% tax band (just - and this helps reduce tax on savings interest and dividends I might take). Gain the NI saving. When I decide to give up work I can take 25% tax free, or even if I don't decide to give up work of course. My pot is c£450k, so that's over £100k I can have any time I fancy it and that's a nice feeling.

You can do an expression of wishes to leave it to your offspring, mate, hairdresser....so it doesn't disappear when you die or anything.

Since I was 45 I decided to view pension as a medium term savings vehicle. I still save elsewhere though, I have stocks and shares ISA, cash ISSAs, fixed term bonds, premium bonds....all can be accessed tax free as the tax was isic when I earned the money.

My plan was to have £400k pension and £100k stocks savings, but now I'm over the £400k my new aim is £500k. This is also a good sum for care home fees.

Since your post, I've drawn up an excel and I think I can afford to do the same for a couple of years at least (i.e. increase salary sacrifice to get to 20% rate).

Am I right in thinking that I just need to work out how much my take home pay is on 50k and increase my salary sacrifice until I reach that amount?

It looks my employer does allow this.

Is there anything else I need to be mindful of, e.g. should I be concerned about NI contributions?

Heatherbell1978 · 01/09/2023 11:44

*Since your post, I've drawn up an excel and I think I can afford to do the same for a couple of years at least (i.e. increase salary sacrifice to get to 20% rate).

Am I right in thinking that I just need to work out how much my take home pay is on 50k and increase my salary sacrifice until I reach that amount?

It looks my employer does allow this.

Is there anything else I need to be mindful of, e.g. should I be concerned about NI contributions?*

This is what I do - I'm in Scotland so can earn around £43k before higher tax band kicks in. So I pay enough into my pension through salary sacrifice to bring my pay to just below this. I work for a big employer and can adjust payments online - I could change it each month if I want to and sometimes I do depending how much spare cash I have. If you go into the Gov. uk tax calculator you should be able to work it out.

usernamealreadytaken · 01/09/2023 13:07

RosaGallica · 30/08/2023 07:41

Sign of the inequality of our times and who the country is run for (clue: not for anyone who works for a living).

I've had a pension at every workplace since I started work at 17 - they're all fairly small but will give me a little to retire on when the time eventually comes. I currently work in the public sector so will have a reasonable pension by the time I retire, with around 25 years service. DH works in the private sector and has saved in his pension since his 30s, and now has around £300k due to saving for his/our future - are you suggesting he hasn't worked for the last 30-odd years?

Workplace pensions are now pretty well compulsory, so hopefully we're moving away from this ridiculous attitude that pensions are only for "others".

Swipe left for the next trending thread