People will need to adapt and the next generations should aim towards jobs/careers that aren't easily done by robots.
It's not a "rich" versus "poor" thing at all. A lot of the jobs that still need doing manually will probably be manual skills that the "poor" can learn to do. Likewise a lot will be high tech jobs, i.e. designing, programming, etc to create and program the robots.
I fear more for the "middlers" such as pen pushers and semi professionals which is where I see the next batch of automation. Factory/production lines have already been automated in the last few decades. The vast swathes of people doing data input, making spreadsheets, PC data manipulation, reporting, etc., are probably the next casualties of AI.
Robots/AI will be able to do all the repetitive work (as in factories today), maybe like building new houses from prefab "kits" or decorate a newly built house. But I can't ever see AI being "smart" enough to rewire an old house, or lime-mortar an old wall, or replace an old house roof.
Look at farming - back in the day, the "manual" farmers would plant and harvest every possible square foot of their land - with automation/machinery, etc., it's only "efficient" to plant and harvest large square/rectangle fields, so lots of smaller "plots" are now ignored.
AI/Robots always takes the "easy" but repetitive tasks - not the niche/specialist/unusual stuff,