Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Why are bloody teachers striking AGAIN?

632 replies

noblegiraffe · 05/07/2023 09:18

Because, dear hearts, the government, when they offered us a pay rise of 4.5%, mostly unfunded for next September and all 4 teaching unions thoroughly rejected it, Gillian Keegan said that teachers would then have to take their chances with the independent pay review body and that there would be no further negotiations.

So teachers did. And the independent pay review body, who seem to have rather more of a handle on the current crisis in teaching than the government, recommended that teachers should get a 6.5% pay rise to introduce some stability into the system.

We only know this because the independent pay review body findings have not been published, but this figure was leaked.

Calls for the government to publish the report have been ignored. Most recently, a freedom of information act request to the DfE for the report was rejected, because the DfE says it's "not in the public interest".

Why is it not in the public interest to know what the independent pay review body has recommended? This report is published every year.

In the meantime, Rishi is briefing the press that he will reject the independent pay review body's recommendations, after making a huge fuss about how he always accepts independent pay review body recommendations.

Why should this matter to parents? Because headteachers are currently trying to write their budgets for September. The end of term is approaching. This job is currently impossible because headteachers don't know how much more they are expected to pay teachers next year, (6.5%? 5?% 4.5%?) and they have no idea how much extra money their school will be given to account for the pay rise (all? some? None??). This makes a massive difference as staffing costs account for the vast majority of school budgets. Should they be planning to cut GCSE subjects? Make staff redundant? Or will they actually be able to plan in some literacy support? That they don't know is intolerable.

A senior government advisor said that school budgets last year weren't worth the paper they were written on because of this same issue, and that it shouldn't be allowed to happen again.

Yet here we are.

The government are trying to drag this out to the summer before they make their pay announcement because then they'll be on their holidays and the 4 teaching unions' ballots will have closed.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
26
toomuchlaundry · 13/07/2023 13:17

Is it going to be funded? I assume if DfE aren't going to be given any more money, they will take it off other areas like building fund. I wonder if they will go reverse their decision on Sport Premium

Forestfriendlygarden · 13/07/2023 13:18

Well done everybody - but please don't vote for the Tories next year!

lifeissweet · 13/07/2023 13:19

Forestfriendlygarden · 13/07/2023 13:09

Looks like good news does'nt it?

It does, but I'm worried about the detail.

Robbing Peter to pay Paul sounds very likely and I don't think schools can afford cuts in any area.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

noblegiraffe · 13/07/2023 13:30

They can’t take money from the building fund with schools actively unsafe.

OP posts:
Redlocks30 · 13/07/2023 13:42

I’m concerned about where in the budget this money will need to come from

toomuchlaundry · 13/07/2023 13:48

@noblegiraffe you would hope they won’t

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread