Any legal thoughts very welcome….
DD should be graduating next week.
She sat 4 exams and did a dissertation for her finals and has received great marks in all except for one.
Due to the latest industrial action by lecturers, the fifth paper will not be marked until October at the earliest and possibly not at all (the uni has mooted that last year’s mark could be used instead).
She is so disappointed. They are planning to go ahead with a graduation ceremony but students won’t know their class of degree.
One overseas student she knows will have visa problems due to requiring a 2.i for a job offer.
After three years of disruption from lecturers (every year of her degree) and then COVID this feels like the final straw.
Does the uni have any contractual obligation to provide marked papers and a degree class by a certain time after the student sits their finals?
I honestly feel like encouraging her to do a class action or similar.
Chat
Does DD have any recourse with uni?
Lismore · 24/06/2023 17:20
IBparent · 16/07/2023 10:21
My daughter is in the same boat with Cardiff Uni. She has all the results bar 1. They’re all either 2:1 or 1st yet she will graduate this week with a pass.
She/we are not anti the MAB but the way the uni have chosen to deal with it is poor. She could graduate with a 2:1 based on the results she does have. The final mark could push her into a 1st so the result could be reclassified at a later date.
@Kirova you are in an unenviable position, but equally, do you expect the graduates affected by this to just shrug their shoulders and wait patiently? DD contacted Cardiff’s ‘helpline’ (as touted by the VC in his official statement’ last Thursday. Was told she would hear back within 48 hours. Yesterday she called again having heard nothing and got a message saying the office is shut until after 24 July.
It would be nice if those who deal with the complaints would consider that the people actually making the complaints have effectively had their lives put on hold through no fault of their own and are just trying to find answers.
Kirova · 16/07/2023 10:07
The correct thing to do is to use their complaints and/or appeals procedure. But this is a no-win situation. Different universities have taken different approaches and ultimately, students aren't happy with any of them. Reweighting / rescaling obviously disadvantages some. Employing alternative markers has also caused a lot of pushback, especially where the students can tell their work has been marked by a "non-specialist". Allowing students to be awarded their degree with marks/ratification pending, likewise.
Any action, whether through the university routes or external legal action, will be dealt with by admin/regulation teams before going before appeals board and so on. The people handling those cases will be sympathetic and diligent, but have no real means to challenge either industrial action or university policy. Ultimately, no one can prohibit individuals from taking part in industrial action, and many universities are deducting pay quite heavily from those who participated in the boycott over the past couple of months.
It would be nice if those who complain would consider that the people who are actually handling the complaints are taking flack and pressure from all sides in this dispute.
IBparent · 16/07/2023 10:21
My daughter is in the same boat with Cardiff Uni. She has all the results bar 1. They’re all either 2:1 or 1st yet she will graduate this week with a pass.
She/we are not anti the MAB but the way the uni have chosen to deal with it is poor. She could graduate with a 2:1 based on the results she does have. The final mark could push her into a 1st so the result could be reclassified at a later date.
@Kirova you are in an unenviable position, but equally, do you expect the graduates affected by this to just shrug their shoulders and wait patiently? DD contacted Cardiff’s ‘helpline’ (as touted by the VC in his official statement’ last Thursday. Was told she would hear back within 48 hours. Yesterday she called again having heard nothing and got a message saying the office is shut until after 24 July.
It would be nice if those who deal with the complaints would consider that the people actually making the complaints have effectively had their lives put on hold through no fault of their own and are just trying to find answers.
Owleetawa · 16/07/2023 13:37
I am fortunate that Dc is only in year 2 but part of a module consisting of the exam and an assignment completed over the Easter "holidays" has just been thrown out, it will never be marked. Rather than giving everyone the standard 2:1 mark which the paper is aimed at, they just disregarded it. Dc is pissed because they like a lot of the other students on that course all did fairly poorly (for them) on another component in that module so spent more time on this assignment and exam revision than other modules because they wanted to pull their grades up a few points. This non-marking meant that weighting was sadly given more heavily to the one part that they all as a cohort did more poorly on pulling their overall grade down. This all counts toward their final grade. They have been given some grades and a 2nd year grade which could go up or down depending on whether more second year work is marked at the start of year 3. This is a uni in the top 10 and as parents we are appalled.
It is a complete shit show with people "graduating" with no actual grades, some because they have lecturers who didn't strike have had all their work marked and have graduated with grades. People are worried about jobs because graduate jobs require a 1st or 2:1. I think the whole situation of striking which has affected my child who was tested on work they were not taught, and not marking work that either gives final year students their grade or work that counts towards their final grade like Dc in year 2 is disgusting behaviour.
SOWK · 16/07/2023 13:13
@Kirova thank you for explaining this so well - I work in a university complaints team, and as you suggest I have no direct influence on the industrial action. It’s going to be a really tough summer for my team.
Kirova · 16/07/2023 10:07
The correct thing to do is to use their complaints and/or appeals procedure. But this is a no-win situation. Different universities have taken different approaches and ultimately, students aren't happy with any of them. Reweighting / rescaling obviously disadvantages some. Employing alternative markers has also caused a lot of pushback, especially where the students can tell their work has been marked by a "non-specialist". Allowing students to be awarded their degree with marks/ratification pending, likewise.
Any action, whether through the university routes or external legal action, will be dealt with by admin/regulation teams before going before appeals board and so on. The people handling those cases will be sympathetic and diligent, but have no real means to challenge either industrial action or university policy. Ultimately, no one can prohibit individuals from taking part in industrial action, and many universities are deducting pay quite heavily from those who participated in the boycott over the past couple of months.
It would be nice if those who complain would consider that the people who are actually handling the complaints are taking flack and pressure from all sides in this dispute.
lieselotte · 16/07/2023 14:22
Yes but the universities should also mitigate the impact, rather than saying "nothing to do with us". A strike of your own workforce is absolutely to do with you.
My son is in his second year so not affected by the degree classification debacle but he only has half his results for the second year.
Pineapplefish · 16/07/2023 14:20
The lecturers have a legal right to strike.
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.