@stopringingme
"I once worked in a retail outlet that sold suitcases and the amount of people who came in with damaged suitcases and expected us to change them when the airline had damaged them, needless to say they were disappointed."
Well the Sale of Goods Act has only been around for 43 years, and it says:
"14 (2) Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business, there is an implied term that the goods supplied under the contract are of satisfactory quality.
(2A)For the purposes of this Act, goods are of satisfactory quality if they meet the standard that a reasonable person would regard as satisfactory, taking account of any description of the goods, the price (if relevant) and all the other relevant circumstances.
(2B)For the purposes of this Act, the quality of goods includes their state and condition and the following (among others) are in appropriate cases aspects of the quality of goods—
(a)fitness for all the purposes for which goods of the kind in question are commonly supplied,
(b)appearance and finish,
(c)freedom from minor defects,
(d)safety, and
(e)durability."
So if your outlet wasn't in the small claims court for every damaged suitcase they refused to refund, then they've been very lucky.
So I think the OP should expect a refund from TK Maxx, and if refused should go so the small claims court.