But covering you isn't the same as him being ill?
So he’s allowed to be unwell but I’m not? You can see how this would lead to a lot of resentment and friction in a marriage? Right?
In theory he could need to take a day off to cover you and then catch your illness himself and need to take 48+ off?
Oh yes, this has happened lots of times. I’d say this is the most frequent way we all get poorly. But again why would he get to be poorly and not me?
I'm glad he is a good husband and steps up when needed, but as I say I really do think surgeons fall into that category of being one of the few jobs you can't just take time off from.
Im not actually in disagreement here. But ultimately it’s not mine or the children’s fault that his job is so ‘important’ and certainly shouldn’t be to our detriment to facilitate. Ultimately, If NHS and country need him that badly then they should compensate that to make it possible, not me. I’m not personally responsible for his constant ability to go to work. I don’t see why I should have to function as a single parent out of some misplaced moral responsibility.
Taking time off 2/3 times a year as you are ill seems quite excessive too. I think even my non important job would be pulling me aside if I had 2/3 instances of being off as my DH was ill.
I don’t enjoy how often we get poorly but between nursery and DH working at the hospital it does happen pretty frequently. I think I do quite well at not ‘hitting the deck’ in comparison to DH and the kids tbh.
(3 DC, youngest is disabled. I know its fucking hard so dont mean to sound like I'm having a go. I get that I sound snarky. I'mmore surprised)
I don’t disagree. I see your point, but Hypothetically, if DH’s job is so important he can’t take time off for anything other than his own sickness… what would I do with DD whilst DS was in hospital? Im not allowed to leave my disabled 3yo in hospital alone and I’m not allowed to take my 2yo with me 🤷♀️
ultimately if a job is genuinely so important that someone isn’t able to function as a partner or parent then it needs to compensate that accordingly, either by paying compensation for an employee to agree not to enter into any dependant situation, or covering the cost of replacing them within that family dynamic.
If we could afford even a PT nanny to take that secondary parent role then I would happily let hubby trot off to work everyday unencumbered but unfortunately we cannot, so I continue to demand his support without any guilt xx