@LeonardCohensRaincoat I actually just said to dh over the weekend that it was strange Joyce was not in Midnight in Paris!!
@caramac04 your teacher chose Ulysses as the reading project for 11 and 12 year olds?? That's a very unusual choice I would have thought?
I feel a bit dispirited that someone could read English at university and write an essay meriting a first without ever having read it. And also would have thought that being a student of English literature would offer the prefect opportunity to explore a text such as Ulysses in a supportive environment? I did not read English but have always been interested in books / thoughts / ideas that have influenced how we understand the world around us and our own behaviours.
As for the pp who said the element of voyeurism on the beach was enough to put them off, I think while that was daring and unusual to write about in the 1910's / 20's it's mild compared to what we read in many many books or see on tv in films and programmes.
I understand it as Joyce desiring to reveal or excavate the entirety of the frailty of the human condition. Bloom was by and large a good man who was flawed (as we all are) and didn't always make the best choices.
Since starting this thread I have also been thinking a lot about the 'inaccessibility' of the references as discussed and it also struck me that education itself was very different in the era the book was written and published. There was a far greater emphasis on classical education and far more people would have been very familiar with The Odyessy then than now. Plus people learned latin in school etc. Lots of the scientific references were new theories / discoveries which would have been in the papers etc so more generally known about?
On the walking tour I did the guide was saying how Bloom's job as an advertising canvasser was a very new notion in 1904 and as such represented modernity and of course we're jaded by the concept of 'selling and advertising now' 100 years later..