It's badly taught and you're also looking at a separate skillset that can be described by maths (as can everything), but actually relates to visual/spatial awareness: I am really, really good at mechanical/engineering type questions, navigation, drawing scale plans, graphics and physics. This meant that the mathematical explanations of these things instantly made sense to me, as they described stuff I could immediately see in my head.
The badly taught aspect is where some teachers don't appreciate that not everybody has a linear concept of the world where numbers alone make sense.
I was always told I was crap at maths by my mother who didn't even pass a CSE in it. I'm not. I excel at applied maths/physics and I'm good at standard stuff (I actively enjoy moving around formulae to solve or simplify - but in my head, I'm swirling around physical things of different size, shape and colour like a Find The Lady card trick).
I've taught adult learners numeracy. The successes came with cartoons illustrating what division means, actions showing how hundreds, tens, units and decimals are laid out/slot into place and pictures of 2 and 3 dimensional shapes for them to relate the words of the questions to a physical thing that could be then described in mathematical terms. Once they could see how these concepts related to 'things', their progress was phenomenally fast.
None of the people I taught were thick - the fastest progress was made by the man who was at pre entry level in September. Two years later, he got an A-star at GCSE. He just needed to 'see' what the squiggles on the page meant and became unstoppable from that moment on.