Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

What do you think of “paedophile hunters”?

84 replies

Username721 · 22/03/2023 21:51

Just curious really.

Are they doing the work of the Lord? Or is vigilante action never ok? Leave it to the police or is this sort of thing everyone’s business?

OP posts:
Zola1 · 24/03/2023 13:15

Honestly, they generally cause more harm than good. They often ruin any Police investigation because they've broadcast evidence and conversation etc all over the Internet. Often they are guilty of entrapment etc.
Some are dodgy as fuck as well, know of one who was arrested himself for Child sexual offences. Think a lot of the people involved as decoys are vulnerable too.

IBegYou · 24/03/2023 13:18

I know five child sex offenders. Four from the same family. One who actually WAS caught by a paedophile hunter. I cannot express the amount of savage satisfaction it gave me to see him confronted by big blokes live on Facebook when he was trying to meet an 11 year old girl for "rough sex." He got away with touching up little girls and pinning teenagers in doorways and rubbing his crotch against them in full view for years. Always "he's harmless, he's a bit slow, he could never do anything to hurt anyone, he just can't get a girlfriend."

Yeah. Savvy enough to hide a mobile phone he used exclusively to groom and to send pictures of his penis to children and send BDSM type demands. Cunning enough to give fake names and take two buses to go to where he was planning to meet these kids. Yeah, I clapped and cheered when I saw him go to pieces when confronted with his messages!

I support them wholeheartedly. If the police don't catch them, someone will. That's good.

Lastnamedidntstick · 24/03/2023 13:22

StylishM · 24/03/2023 13:07

Very close friend was the detective in charge of child endangerment and abuse area of our local police force. Some shifts, she was the ONLY detective available to cover 3 counties. Schools would make safeguarding referrals that HAD to be investigated before the end of the school day, in case a child was released to an unsafe home. Sometimes she had 5 of these referrals between 9am and midday, and have 3 hours to review, investigate and assess them all. If she made the wrong call and allowed a child to be released to their career and the child then came to harm, she would not only have that on her conscience but she would lose her job. She was also expected to watch colleagues watching child abuse materials to grade the severity of the images/videos. This is on top of investigating active paedophiles. Over half of her department was off work with stress/depression and the funding was cut to the bone. She left after 3 years after seeing a child die while investigating a family member for being an abuser.

While I don't agree with vigilantes at all, something has to be done to stop the rampant abuse of our countries most vulnerable children. It's well known that paedophiles will target vulnerable single mothers, kids in care and children with behavioural issues. It's heartbreaking as abuse changes the entire trajectory of a child's life.

Surely much of that should be social services?

the police can remove kids in an emergency situation, but the reviewing and making the decision as to whether children are safe at home is social services. In school hours all that should be done by the appropriate safeguarding authorities, the police should only be looking at the crime aspect.

the police’s job is to investigate crime. Yet increasingly they also provide social, ambulance and mental health services because they aren’t fit for purpose, while chronically under resourced themselves.

sort out mental health care, social
services, and the other billion things that aren’t within the police’s remit (like putting down distressed wild animals at the roadside because no vet or RSPCA can get there). Then the police may have a chance to do some actual investigating of you know, crime.

Lastnamedidntstick · 24/03/2023 13:24

ETA not saying your friend was wrong or not doing a fantastic job, just that if others were able to do/were doing their job then she wouldn’t have ended up in the burnout situation she did.

NeverTrustAPoliceman · 24/03/2023 13:28

I would have been quite happy for the convicted sex offender in my wider family to have been dealt with by vigilantes.

SerendipityJane · 24/03/2023 13:35

Honestly, they generally cause more harm than good. They often ruin any Police investigation because they've broadcast evidence and conversation etc all over the Internet.

So if they aren't paedophiles themselves, they are helping paedophiles.

GandhiDeclaredWarOnYou · 24/03/2023 13:41

Ghoulish, prurient, attention-seeking thugs.

sickofthisbollocks · 24/03/2023 15:28

There is an excellent episode of Criminals on Netflix with Sharon Horgan where she plays a paedophile hunter. Well worth a watch.

Username721 · 24/03/2023 17:27

sickofthisbollocks · 24/03/2023 15:28

There is an excellent episode of Criminals on Netflix with Sharon Horgan where she plays a paedophile hunter. Well worth a watch.

Nap trapped with my baby so I’ve stuck this on.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread