Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Who is able to build up this sort of pension pot?

117 replies

NetballMumGrrr · 14/03/2023 08:58

£1 million and now £1.7 million’ who can put £40k a year into a pension? And now £60k?

such disparities in wealth in this country!

BBC Pension Article

OP posts:
Fairyliz · 16/03/2023 07:17

DomesticShortHair · 14/03/2023 09:02

A lot of them will be senior doctors and consultants, apparently. You know, the ones who were junior doctors once, that’s the ones who are on strike today because they don’t think they get enough money? Them.

This!
Poor little darlings how did they manage before?

MissyB1 · 16/03/2023 07:22

NetballMumGrrr · 16/03/2023 07:10

‘Labour has already vowed to reverse the abolition of the £1m tax-free cap on pension savings announced in the Budget, saying it only helps the richest…’

It seems the Labour Party have that wrong. Is Kier S not aware of the impact on medics?

He’s playing politics I’m afraid. Bad move on that one Keir, don’t piss off the medics.

BarbaraofSeville · 16/03/2023 07:26

For the hard of hearing at the back, this is not about rich people hiding money from taxation.

It's about trying to address the chronic shortage of doctors in this country and one reason for that is that experienced doctors are quitting because they're being very heavily taxed on money that does not exist, due to the way their pension is valued.

They could have kept the lifetime allowance but exempted money in approved final salary pension schemes and solved it that way.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

midgemadgemodge · 16/03/2023 07:30

The majority who benefit will not be doctors

Is there sone measurement happening? How many doctors do they think will return ? And how many will defer retirement ? Will the handout be scraped if certain targets are not met ?

Madamecastafiore · 16/03/2023 07:31

RR just said they'd keep the new rule on pensions for medics but reverse it for everyone else. Is that even legal?

BashirWithTheGoodBeard · 16/03/2023 07:46

Fairyliz · 16/03/2023 07:17

This!
Poor little darlings how did they manage before?

Apparently some of them managed by working less or not at all, which given the chronic shortage of experienced doctors in this country is a bit of a concern.

notimagain · 16/03/2023 07:46

Madamecastafiore · 16/03/2023 07:31

RR just said they'd keep the new rule on pensions for medics but reverse it for everyone else. Is that even legal?

Somebody will have to remind me but I think under some previous legislation there were some exemptions to the LTA limit for some groups (some in the legal professions? - ring any bells with anybody).

It has certainly been possible to be in the private sector and hit the LTA limit (and clobber the annual contributions limit as well), you needed a good but not necessarily astronomic wage and also a long contribution history.

The part of the solution at one company was to go part time (which then caused establishment/work coverage issues)....

This isn't just an issue that is confined to consultants and bankers.

notimagain · 16/03/2023 08:02

@Madamecastafiore

I think under some previous legislation there were some exemptions to the LTA limit for some groups (some in the legal professions? - ring any bells with anybody).

To possibly answer my own question I might be thinking of the Judicial Pension Scheme 1993..

www.mypension.com/media/1446/moj-jupra-1993-scheme-guide.pdf

BashirWithTheGoodBeard · 16/03/2023 08:10

Someone linked me on another thread to stuff about how the judicial pension scheme managed this because it was unregistered, whereas the NHS one is. But obviously the NHS one covers an absolutely massive group and income spectrum so I don't know whether that would be workable. I don't know a lot about the specifics of how this all works though so don't offer this as a remotely informed take.

ArcticSkewer · 16/03/2023 08:53

notimagain · 16/03/2023 08:02

@Madamecastafiore

I think under some previous legislation there were some exemptions to the LTA limit for some groups (some in the legal professions? - ring any bells with anybody).

To possibly answer my own question I might be thinking of the Judicial Pension Scheme 1993..

www.mypension.com/media/1446/moj-jupra-1993-scheme-guide.pdf

You are also thinking of MPs!!

Funny, that!

ParentsTrapped · 16/03/2023 08:55

Fairyliz · 16/03/2023 07:17

This!
Poor little darlings how did they manage before?

Do you actually think doctors don’t deserve to be paid well for what they do?

DomesticShortHair · 16/03/2023 12:17

ParentsTrapped · 16/03/2023 08:55

Do you actually think doctors don’t deserve to be paid well for what they do?

They are already paid well, hence their reaching of the LTA. As to what they do, going on strike is obviously higher on their list than helping their vulnerable patients.

Tryingtokeepgoing · 16/03/2023 12:28

BarbaraofSeville · 14/03/2023 13:56

I think the amount is including the employer contribution, assumed investment growth, and possibly tax relief.

The person who's pot it was contributed only a tiny fraction of the notional value of the pot and, unless they live to far beyond average lifetime expectancy, they won't necessarily get it all back either.

I'm not an actuary so don't fully understand the maths behind it, but it's often said that the size of pension pot required to draw an index linked pension of a fairly average amount such as £30k is hundreds of thousands of pounds.

I've just looked at an illustration for me. It assumes that I'll live to 92 and my final salary pension will be valued on that basis. Even if I die a couple of years into retirement and the amount I put in out of my own money, let alone this huge theoretical 'value' was barely touched.

In the real, non public sector, world the size of pension fund needed to generate £30,000 a year, risk-free and index linked would be between £1.2m and £1.5m. Even taking a draw down approach, and attendant risk, would require the fund to be £1m or so. Way beyond what most private sector employees can aspire to. Yesterdays changes ostensible my aimed at doctors, will actually cost in the region of £3 billion and will benefit a tiny minority of people. I’m one, but though I’ll be a lot better off I disagree that now was the time do to it.

Mamabear345 · 14/06/2023 06:19

OP you’re forgetting to factor in Compound Interest. If you pension is invested well then it increases by X% each year through interest.
Look up a compound interest calculator, you’ll be surprised what a small pot now will become in 20 years just on compound interest alone.

I’m a stay at home mum, we max at the SIPP allowance for me, a lifetime ISA, and a stock and share account. The first two have a small government contribution and I’ve invested them well so my interest is high! My husband contributes 12% of his salary and his company contribute 6%. We also have a private retirement stock and share account for him too.
If the average compound interest is as low as 2% we will have over £2M at age 55 and intent to retire.

Mamabear345 · 14/06/2023 06:21

To add: not public sector, or doctor.
We’re currently 31.

MintJulia · 14/06/2023 06:58

It also depends on market conditions.

I have always earned about 3x national wage, so about £80k today.

I started my pension in 1985 and have paid in whatever was the standard minimum (3% or 5%) except for one period of five years when employer & I paid in 12.5% between us. Because there have been periods of strong growth during that time, my pension pot is currently about 500k.

At no time have I been a mega high earner so I can see that someone earning even 20k more than me could add in an extra £5k a year, and have double what I have now. That includes a lot of people.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page