And yes, I moved house into the catchment of a very good school; 14 years ago now. It had an Outstanding OFSTED; by the way. But I liked the school, the feel, the ethics, the SLT.
Bear in mind this is a very stable school with a very MC (multinational) intake. The DC arrive at 11 school-ready, motivated. And leave with good results, having had a good school experience.
This school has recently been re-graded 'Good'. But I'd send mine again tomorrow if they weren't 21 and 23!
But, here's the thing. What earned them the great OFSTED initially? Was it smoke and mirrors? Ours played OFSTED, all paperwork present and correct. Because they made it so. However, it was and is a good school with a strong leadership team and a school-ready intake. They readily acknowledged that this was their strength. MC DC with very supportive parents.
Whereas one primary our DC attended (without choice, we arrived in the UK 6 weeks before DC1 was due to start Reception!) was brilliant due to an inspiring, motivated Head. Lots of social deprivation etc, large white WC intake. But he Lead that school. Results upped, parents happier- then he left (onwards and upwards) and the school collapsed. Lucky we'd just moved our DC on by then to a more pedestrian, less dynamic but 'involved parent' primary by, in the good secondary catchment.
It can take years to build a good school, with good leadership, made far, far easier, and quicker, with a solid intake of school-ready DC with involved parents; it can take months to destroy it with poor leadership and disengaged parents and pupils.
Which is this school?