I wouldn’t have been able to ‘give const’ in labour if my life depended on it. I was in so many pain I couldn’t think let alone talk or make decisions. It’s a false economy because what sounds like ‘informed decision making’ is actually putting a woman on the spot to make a medical decision which she is not trained to do, when she’s in a lot of pain and stress. I’m happy to trust professionals to look after me.
I saw the documentary on maternity scandal in the U.K., and while there were some clear cases of shoddy care, there was one case of a lady who was an older mum whose last baby was an EMCS. She had chosen (against advice) to have a home birth, which went very sadly wrong and the baby died after a rushed transfer and another EMCS. Her complaint was that medical staff didn’t ‘take control’ of her situation. Now I can see what she meant, but I’m going against medical advice having ‘informed herself of the risks’ it seemed very much to me that she had taken control of the situation. I can’t see the staff would’ve had much thanks had they trampled her birth plan and whisked her in for a c section against her wishes either.
There was another thread on here sometime ago where the poster was thinking of legal action because she decided not to transfer her baby to hospital (another home birth) after ingesting meconium and the baby became unwell. She said she was in ‘no fit state’ to make this decision after giving birth and that it ‘should’ve been taken out of her hands’.
It’s a fine line and I can see how the medical staff cannot win.