It's someone I hope to employ working with children. You don't need a clear DBS I.e. a conviction for fraud wouldn't necessarily exclude you, but we have to do a risk assessment where there is any conviction.
This conviction is for owning an out of control dog. The dog attacked candidate's own son. Dog was destroyed, candidate mortified. My reaction was it sounds awful, but doesn't affect the work.
The colleague I was discussing it with (joint decision required) said "well it might not be relevant, but it could very much speak to who she is".
What do you think?