Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Liz Truss to raise income tax thresholds?

231 replies

GreenLunchBox · 06/09/2022 22:18

There are rumours that she's going to increase the higher tax threshold to £80k. I think this is a good idea and will increase productivity. Sunak keeping the threshold frozen was a sneaky stealth tax. In this time of rampant inflation it's unfair for people to receive a small payrise and find themselves significantly paying more tax than before

It will also help with the rental property shortage as it will help to mitigate the unfavorable tax changes for landlords so less will be likely to sell up

OP posts:
sweetkitty · 06/09/2022 23:30

Ive never understood people’s thinking on tax - woman at my work works 3 days a week, there’s an opening for the other 2 days I asked if she’s going to apply “oh no I’ll be taxed then it won’t be worth my while” I don’t get that mindset yes you’ll pay tax but you’ll still keep your personal allowance, every pound over that you will only pay what 24p in tax and NI so you will make 76p so say you made an extra £76 that’s better than not making it IYSWIM.

same applies when you go over the 43K mark (we’re in Scotland) so for every £100 you make over that you will effectively lose £40 or another way of looking at it is you gain £60. I think it would be mad to never accept promotions or pay rises to stay under the threshold

MoistBandana · 06/09/2022 23:32

Those same people refusing roses, promotions and paying in to a pension to avoid tax are likely the same types moaning that Amazon avoids tax and that poor people don't pay enough tax..

LemonSwan · 06/09/2022 23:36

But the threshold or barrier as you wish to refer to it as; has to be somewhere.

And yes I don’t get it. Fair enough if your working part time and so the added hours of work don’t match what you believe is worth spending your time on. (I do this myself as work part time).

However if your full time what difference does it make? So what if you earn 50k and get x or earn 55k and get x (ie. no better off/ no worse off in take home). It doesn’t actually make any difference to you - except that you give back more to society. How awful.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

cakeorwine · 06/09/2022 23:47

I wonder if people know the median salary in the UK. Not in the Home Counties.

But in the UK?

Clue - it's not £50,000.

Uptowntwirl · 06/09/2022 23:48

I mean someone else will come and take those jobs anyway so it doesn't really matter. I'd lower the threshold

MoistBandana · 06/09/2022 23:51

cakeorwine · 06/09/2022 23:47

I wonder if people know the median salary in the UK. Not in the Home Counties.

But in the UK?

Clue - it's not £50,000.

Without googling, I think it's around 25k..

But it could be nearer 30k now.

OP posts:
findingsomeone · 06/09/2022 23:54

LemonSwan · 06/09/2022 23:36

But the threshold or barrier as you wish to refer to it as; has to be somewhere.

And yes I don’t get it. Fair enough if your working part time and so the added hours of work don’t match what you believe is worth spending your time on. (I do this myself as work part time).

However if your full time what difference does it make? So what if you earn 50k and get x or earn 55k and get x (ie. no better off/ no worse off in take home). It doesn’t actually make any difference to you - except that you give back more to society. How awful.

So in my situation, the next job up isn't worth it to me because, for the pay rise post tax, the additional responsibility isn't worth it. I'm not taking on a load more shit for so little extra in the bank. I'll stay on a pay band below my abilities and have a better work life balance. The trade off for upsetting my work life balance is a hell of a lot more than what the net pay rise is.

GreenLunchBox · 06/09/2022 23:58

findingsomeone · 06/09/2022 23:54

So in my situation, the next job up isn't worth it to me because, for the pay rise post tax, the additional responsibility isn't worth it. I'm not taking on a load more shit for so little extra in the bank. I'll stay on a pay band below my abilities and have a better work life balance. The trade off for upsetting my work life balance is a hell of a lot more than what the net pay rise is.

I now realise why there are no threads on this. I think we need to take ourselves off to other forums to debate it.

OP posts:
LemonSwan · 07/09/2022 00:06

findingsomeone · 06/09/2022 23:54

So in my situation, the next job up isn't worth it to me because, for the pay rise post tax, the additional responsibility isn't worth it. I'm not taking on a load more shit for so little extra in the bank. I'll stay on a pay band below my abilities and have a better work life balance. The trade off for upsetting my work life balance is a hell of a lot more than what the net pay rise is.

Yeah I get it, but so what. The solution is you don’t take the job because you don’t want it. Not ‘the whole country has to reclassify their taxes because I am stuck on a border.

If she did raise it are you really saying that the meanial amount of extra tax your paying would suddenly make it worth it. Very much doubt it.

antelopevalley · 07/09/2022 00:32

This is a terrible idea. It will cost a fair bit of money and have no positive impact on the economy or the problems the country faces.

antelopevalley · 07/09/2022 00:41

MoistBandana · 06/09/2022 23:51

Without googling, I think it's around 25k..

But it could be nearer 30k now.

The published figures are not that accurate as it excludes the poorest paid - those on part-time work and those part of the gig economy and on zero-hours contracts.

notdaddycool · 07/09/2022 00:51

Given NI drops down when it goes up there increase is only really 30% to 40%. I’d be delighted if they were both merged. It works be a whole lot clearer and simpler and rich pensioners works pay a bit more too. They should get rid of employers NI over time too.

ZaZathecat · 07/09/2022 00:52

Any tax cuts should be to help the low paid, not the well-paid. I agree with a pp that raiding the personal allowance to £20-25000 would be a much better plan.

antelopevalley · 07/09/2022 01:19

So how will this be paid for?

Pleasebeafleabite · 07/09/2022 04:57

LemonSwan · 06/09/2022 23:36

But the threshold or barrier as you wish to refer to it as; has to be somewhere.

And yes I don’t get it. Fair enough if your working part time and so the added hours of work don’t match what you believe is worth spending your time on. (I do this myself as work part time).

However if your full time what difference does it make? So what if you earn 50k and get x or earn 55k and get x (ie. no better off/ no worse off in take home). It doesn’t actually make any difference to you - except that you give back more to society. How awful.

Only on MN is it “awful” not to want to pay 43% tax on what you earn and lose child benefit Grin

You crack on with your part time dear

MinervaTerrathorn · 07/09/2022 05:19

I'd raise the personal allowance to minimum wage and to track that going forward, benefits everyone earning above the threshold. Whatever decides the minimum wage, increase the higher threshold annually in line with that. Merge income tax and NI into one tax.

MinervaTerrathorn · 07/09/2022 05:39

She is talking about unfreezing the personal allowance too right? Otherwise any low income earners getting a deceny pay rise to help survive the cost of living don't get the same rise when it comes to their take home pay.

the80sweregreat · 07/09/2022 05:40

LemonSwan · 06/09/2022 22:59

She’s bonkers. We are all fucked.

Yep :(

Beachbreak2411 · 07/09/2022 06:11

Ah so the rich get richer? Fucking stupid idea. Tax those rich bastards more and help prop up our failing NHS etc.

Ladybrrrd · 07/09/2022 06:13

By increase productivity, do you mean 'well off people will be able to spend more'?

tigger1001 · 07/09/2022 06:19

We can't have it all ways. We can't have tax cuts while also helping people with the energy crisis. That's just a recipe for disaster. What services should be cut to pay for it?

User148563 · 07/09/2022 06:23

Would be better to just reinstate child benefits for over £50k, that was never a very fair move, especially as they kept the pensioner benefits for all like the winter fuel payment

NCHammer2022 · 07/09/2022 06:23

I actually do think the higher level threshold should be raised, it’s lost pace with where it was supposed to be when it was brought in and brought far more people into the bracket than it should have. But it’s definitely not a priority for now. Tbh any tinkering with taxes doesn’t make a massive amount of difference to people at an individual level but makes a huge difference at the total level in terms of how much is available to fund public services. A tax change that left me £100 a month richer would cost billions but would still be swallowed up in general price rises so wouldn’t change any of my behaviour as a consumer.

Metabigot · 07/09/2022 06:26

GreenLunchBox · 06/09/2022 22:41

This clearly isn't the place for a debate on this subject. Lots of angry replies. So I'll bid you all goodnight

Is that your Liz??