DH and I are going round in circles on this.
We moved to this area a couple of years ago. There were no places at our closest school but DD (then year 1) got offered a place at a school in the next town. She settled in really well and made good friends so we kept her there even when a place came up at our closest school as we didn’t want to disrupt her. Also the school she’s at (in the next town) has a better reputation than the closer school, although I know these things are very subjective.
It takes about 20 minutes each way to get there (including driving, parking, walking to the playground etc) so it’s really not THAT bad but I’m sick of it! The vast majority of kids walk as they live in the streets around the school. Playdates are fine and we manage but it always involves driving. I just don’t feel such a close connection to the school community compared to our old school where we lived a 5 minute walk away.
We also have a younger DS who is about to start at the same school so the school runs are stretching way way into the future.
As a result I want to consider moving house. This would obviously cost us in stamp duty etc plus the area closer to the school is more expensive so we might have to downsize. DH thinks I’m totally bonkers and can’t understand why I’d consider this extra expense just so we no longer have to drive to school.
He does share pick ups and drop offs 50/50 so it’s fair enough that he gets a vote 😆
For context, it’s unlikely that it would affect secondary schools. She’d probably go to the same secondary whether we stay here or move house as both areas feed into the same school.
So am I totally mad or do I have a point??