I'm in England, doesn't matter if it's school or college, full time further education for 16-18 years olds doesn't bring with it any loans etc. Only apprenticeships bring a wage. Higher education at 18+ they obviously get loans etc.
My son is in Year 11, recently got a part time job with limited hours due to exams but which should increase after his exams.
He is likely going to college ft: we will still pay for all his essentials such as travel, phone, lunches, internet, all telly/streaming services, toiletries, basic clothes, etc, driving lessons when he's 17.
DP thinks he shouldn't get any spending money for recreation when he is able to work more hours at his part time job and thus fund his own recreation. DS really enjoys socialising, playing football, buying designer clothes, watching football etc. He spends a lot!
I think he should still get a little bit of spending money for fun until he is able to work full time/have an apprenticeship/attend higher education at 18.
I can't work out who is right. I understand his logic that DS is old enough now to have a part time job but it just seems a bit mean.