Simple question in last sentence if you want to skip.
Trying to figure out if DH is gaslighting me, run of the mill bs or has actually done further research. Based on the last 30 years I think its the first two rather than the last but happy to be told otherwise.
His new (2nd hand) car had unlimited engine size (believe its over 2.5l) just because he has a bigger car (even though 51 weeks of year its just him commuting ), including high tax and insurance.
DD new (2nd hand) car could not be 1 litre as these engines aren't made to last/have high mileage (to much pressure over time etc) on them so needs to be 1.2l minimum, preferably more.
Three months and three weeks later respectively I am now being told that my new (2nd hand) car has to be 1 litre as they do last just as long as any other engine size. He researched it. In fact they are better than 1.4 (my current and very poorly focus).
I know manufacturers have tweaked engines so they run better per power but my old fiesta was 1.2l and there was hardly any power to get me out of trouble if needed. Hated not having that umph.
So...is there enough umph in a recent 1l similar to an older 1.4l or is he lying yet again to avoid letting me have something decent which is less than third in price to his whilst coming across as generous and kind but actually not?
Sorry - is 2012+ 1 litre engine as good for power and longevity as a pre 2012 1.4 litre?