We had the three tier school system when I started school (mid 70s) but it hadn’t been in place that long, maybe three or so years. So the younger years (I believe up to todays Y2) were still considered the infant school and as far as I was aware there was no smacking.
Once you got to the old juniors (Y3 and Y4) the teachers could give you the ‘slipper’ which in fact was a plimsoll. I only really remember one of the teachers wielding it in the dinner queue, to tap the bum of misbehaving kids. The two teachers for these years were therefore much feared - until you got into their class. They were both great teachers, so the use (or even threat) of corporal punishment was completely unnecessary really. They could have easily commanded respect without it.
Middle school (early 80s) had the cane, it was on the top of a cabinet in the HT’s study. It was considered only to be used on the boys. There were rumours of ‘naughty’ boys who’d been caned but no boy ever told me of their personal experience of this punishment and I don’t think anyone was actually caned when I was there.
High school, as far as I was aware, had nothing. Although it was still very much legal then. It was a selective all girls grammar pre the education restructuring in the early 70s and I think the discipline hangover (including some teachers from that era who just seemed to emanate control) was such it just wasn’t needed.
I don’t know if the three tier thing was considered a bit progressive and therefore more nurturing, and teachers were less inclined to use physical discipline.
I often see people in Facebook nostalgia groups saying how it ‘never did them any harm’ but I just cannot imagine how an adult in a position of trust thought beating a child with an implement was ever acceptable.
I remember when Cathy got the cane in Grange Hill, I was horrified! I also remember that Mrs McClusky seemed very reluctant to do it - maybe reflecting the real life change of attitudes.