I don't do snack baskets, because I tried it, & the resultant 'MUM HE'S STOLEN MY SATSUMA' arguments were enormously wearing.
I just did a well stocked fruit bowl, free access to the veg drawer in the fridge, & anything genuinely junky was bought, with pocket money, on a planned trip to the shops to be eaten there & then.
However, I've now got hulking teenagers who certainly wouldn't dream of buying fruit with their allowances. That's for Starbucks with their mates or crisps on the way home, right? Apples & carrots pffff. Mum always has those knocking about...
So I'm not entirely convinced that creating a dichotomy between 'healthy 5 a day, help yourself' & 'chocolate & crisps are rationed goodies' was my best ever parenting moment.
Maybe I should have policed managed snacks better when they were little.
However, I've got:
Ds,17, who eats everything & is overweight. He's trying hard to lose it. But he adores junky food & buys far too much of it before/at/after school. He's a bit old for me to put him on a lunch box full of carrot sticks, & has an allowance from xh which I can't control.
Dd1,15, who isn't fussed about food unless it's placed in front of her. She absent mindedly grazes on fruit or cereal or toast at all hours. Happily eats dinner. Her weight is fine, but her eating habits certainly aren't great.
Dd2, 13, who is very into sport, very health aware, & has never developed much of a taste for snacks anyway. She can go through the fruit bowl & the fridge like a biblical plague of locusts, though, & is noted for getting unbelievably hangry if dinner is late. Very fussy eater.
Objectively, dd2 is the healthiest of the three in terms of her diet. But they all grew up with identical house rules. I'm not sure this is a game you get to win, tbh.