I have a active little boy (almost 3) and reading through threads on mn, I'm sure I'm being judged as a bad parent, not disciplining him or there's some sort of neurological problem but can't a little boy just be active because he is active? I'm by no means a soft parent or a parent that doesn't follow through consequences threats. I'm consistent, use the word' no', remove him from situations, follow like a helicopter and not let him run loose etc. Please tell me why is it that active kids are always by default frowned upon and thought to have some discipline issues or some behavioural problems?
My DH and all the males in his family were apparently like ds when younger so I know there's some strong genetic links but today they are all successful entrepreneurs, help out in charities and are admirable fathers and husbands. Me on the other hand including my 3 siblings were all content otherwise dm wouldn't have had 4 but are totally different and lead different lives compared to DH and his family apart from me as I'm a sahm right now and obviously live with DH so I'm connected to his life in that way iyswim. The older generation including my mil and even my dad just recently said it's always good to be active and forceful by nature. Is this true? Please tell me your experiences because I'm feeling like a failure or there's something wrong. Even in nursery, ds is a nightmare as he doesn't listen, doesn't sit. Baby groups were a nightmare too. The toddler that you see in the supermarket that throws himself on the floor or in the airport because he wants to climb the shelves or run the wrong way up the escalators belongs to me 🙋♀️
Please tell me about your experiences with active kids and how they turned out 