‘ In last year's ruling, the tribunal found the Met's claims that undercover officers (UCOs) knew sexual relationships were banned were "materially undermined by the sheer frequency with which [Mr Kennedy] (and other UCOs) did conduct sexual relationships without either questions being asked or action being taken by senior officers".
It concluded the case was not just about a "renegade police officer who took advantage of his undercover deployment", but also that authorisations were "fatally flawed".’
I have seen what happens when people try to oppose businesses who murder for profit, or challenge the legitimacy of war and because I have known an environmentally conscious teen end up pregnant by an undercover spy cop.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-60132610?fbclid=IwAR3GGQSMquPQOoys_MQkHFZ8rv854jd4ysx0pUGQyDKbVx4ajWiArd9ydqM