I honestly don’t know. And I speak as someone who needs a heart transplant at some point in the future, and who has been told at one point in the past that I am ineligible for a transplant until a different intervention bought me some time.
Perhaps if in the future it became a mainstream alternative then yes, but as things currently stand no, I don’t think I would.
This man has been told he still only likely has a max of 6-9 months left to live, the only difference at the moment is that his heart is working for itself whereas he was previously on ECMO to keep him alive.
The one hope is that he will recover enough to be eligible for a human heart transplant which if that happens could be seen as a positive, But we are a very long way off from this being a viable alternative to human heart transplant and to it solving the organ shortage, so on that basis no, I wouldn’t want to just be bought a crumb of extra life.
But I’m not afraid of dying having had a cardiac arrest in the past, and I don’t believe in life at all cost.
Recently I watched an episode of surgeons on the BBC, where a man had a procedure to cure him of cancer which meant the removal of both his bladder and rectum and the insertion of two stoma’s. he would lose all that functionality as well as any sexual function. The treatment is considered so radical that around 20% of people refuse it and opt for the alternative instead.
I can hand on heart say that I wouldn’t go through a treatment like that, and would instead opt to go to Switzerland so that I was spared the drawn-out death from cancer.