Used as justification for an affair.
I was out with a group last night. One of the men is currently paying the mortgage on a house lived in my his exwife and son. As it was explained, her new partner is also living there, although that's not within the terms of the agreement. Son turned 18 recently and the house is supposed to be sold so they can each have their equity and no more mortgage payments, although ex appears to be in no hurry. Son is currently living with Dad anyway.
Obviously I've no idea what the truth of it all is and expect there's another side to the story, but on the face of it this man has been paying to keep his ex and her new partner, the group was outraged on his behalf.
Then it turned to why they split. He had an affair, he was very matter of fact about it. She stopped sleeping with him for 12 months it was almost, "what did she expect?"
Everyone else seemed to agree with that view too. Really, no sex for 12 months when there's a child and it's normal/expected that he'd go elsewhere?
Again I'm sure there's much more to it, he feels she was already with the new partner, but he was the one who got caught, it's the reaction of the group that puzzles me, that the affair was perfectly normal and to be expected in the circumstances.
Is it?