The demographic of 'poorer' people contesting who think relatively trivial amounts of money are life changing, means they often take the skewed offer.
Isn't the point that those "relatively trivial amounts" are life changing for someone on a lower income?
There must be some kind of formula to work it out. It's probably different if you don't have certain things either.
Like for me life changing would be money for
Driving lessons + car + language course + university fees + nursery fees for however long I study for.
(I guess that would be around 20-30k)
That's not a sum I can currently afford but it's what I'd love to do.
DH is obsessed with buying a house, I'm not sure that paying off a mortgage would be hugely different to paying rent, but he'd love 50k for a deposit. Of course 3-400,000 would buy a house outright and that would be lifestyle changing as we'd have an extra 800ish (1k+ if we paid off all debts too) a month to do what we liked with, which is a pretty big chunk to gain in one go.
I feel like lifechanging = that thing I've always wanted to do (start a business, retrain, move, retire early) but can't afford to, and that thing/price point is different for different people.