I have a warranty for my fridge freezer and it has broken. They agree it needs replacing but are saying everything is out of stock, even though their website have it, they are saying its a different warehouse.
They offered us something that was half as good as our current fridge.....obviously not ok. Then a refund. Problem with refund is we got a great deal and a couole of years ago. The same item is now 800 more which obviously we should not have to pay as they should give us a like for like.
I thought if this was the case they should provide at least the equivalent item and if not the next item they can find that is better not worse. Is that not the law? Nothing about this in terms and conditions so we are just whatever the law is. Can anyone answer that for me please?
Looking like small claims court but want to make sure we are correct. I dint see how they should get away with giving us something worth half the price.
Many thanks for you help legal minds on mumsnet!