Have been going round in circles in my head so hoping for other, more constructive views! I've got two primary aged DC, one in KS1 and one in KS2. We're in a secondary school black hole on the London fringes, and for various other reasons too I've decided to move further out. It will just be me and the DC, and I'll be commuting back into London two days a week.
I really can't decide whether to move to Winchester (great schools, lovely place to live, good if crowded commute for where I work near Waterloo) or to a leafy suburb of Birmingham where we have some family, including a cousin to play with and just generally a "village" to help me raise my kids. I can afford a better house in Birmingham, and if I could get a seat on the train the commute would be just about doable. However it looks like all the primaries are completely full with long waiting lists, whereas in Winchester I think I could get them both into a village school which would just about work and looks nice. Secondary school options are very good in both, although Winch has the benefit of no grammars and possibly a choice of great comps, whereas in this bit of Brum there is just one comp, though very good.
I'd love to live near family, for the kids as well as for me, but am I crazy to go through the hell of no school places, super-long commutes etc? One part of me says go for Brum so the kids can grow up with their family around and I've got a safety net if the trains get really delayed or there's an emergency, the other part says go for lovely Winchester and just find a really great after school nanny (I'm sure they're like gold dust but that's another thread!). What would you do?