I’ve been on citalopram for six years, for generalised anxiety disorder, plus health anxiety. I suffer from OCD in the form of intrusive thoughts, too. All this is just for context.
Citalopram has given me my life back, tbh. I tapered off it two years ago, and all my symptoms returned. I went to see the GP who prescribed it, and we agreed that i should stay on it. She put it that some people need an asthma inhaler, some people need insulin, some need citalopram. All fine.
Until last night, when I had my review to get my script renewed. Some GP I’d never met rang and when I told her I’d been on it for six years, started to lecture me about how she only prescribes for 6-12 months; how after that it stops working; how people think they need it because of the withdrawal when they stop, but if they can ride out the bumpy time they find they get better; on and on.
She asked me nothing about my mental health, my history, nothing. Just kept booming, ‘nobody is going to take it away from you, but...’ and then launching into another lecture.
I came off the phone really embarrassed, anxious, doubting myself and I haven’t really slept. I also plunged into a big emotional eating binge.
I’m sorry this is long. I’m just cross but also wondering if she was right - not in her approach, but in what she was saying?
Thanks for reading if you’ve got this far.