In fairness to the posters saying it’s misleading, that particular article didn’t set out the criteria, and when you top the list having seemingly ‘given away’ more than 125% of your personal wealth I see why it looks misleading.
But he’s done an astonishing thing, and backed it heavily with his own money as well as getting donations from others and forcing policy change.
There are always going to be people that have a go, or want to cut successful people down, but Marcus Rashford really doesn’t deserve any snark.