Also isn't American healthcare basically a money making Industry? A business?
It is a business, as is health insurance. One of Liz Warren's plans was, essentially, to make all insurance run through the government, so as to remove the idea of profit. (It's basically what Medicare for All is.)
What I'd say about healthcare is that it's enormously divided. The best hospitals in America are very possibly the best in the world, and there are easily 40-50 that match pace with almost anywhere. You don't have to be fancy to have these--you can go with a solidly middle-class (American middle class) healthcare plan.
The healthcare for the poor, particularly the rural poor, is appalling. Rural hospitals are closing left and right and so many people don't have a primary care physician. For some, the A&E is used as such, because it's the only place that guarantees treatment without insurance. This is hugely expensive and very bad policy.
I don't think people in Britain understand the deep streak of American libertarianism (I struggle with understanding it myself). When Obama insisted that everyone in America carry health insurance, which was to drive down costs overall, there was such a huge backlash that it started political movements. There are still at least a dozen states that have refused to take the Medicaid expansion, which would expand healthcare to working class people in large part through federal funding, because a) they object to the chance to be taxed for it and b) they don't want the federal government telling them what to do.
So, it is among the best healthcare systems in the worldif you have the resources to access it. Again, you don't have to be richthere are secretaries or custodians in companies with great healthcare plans who have access to the best hospitals in the world, but it's by dint of the luck of their employer.
It is also an unacceptable system for so many who don't have access to it.