Another vote from another linguistics grad for Tolkien.
Jackie Collins I still love, I think you have to approach it as she's a cracking storyteller if not a literary writer. Same is true of Jeffrey archer his short stories are fabulous fun but won't be well regarded. I still regularly read "not a penny more..." it's very much along the lines of things like tv shows hustle and white collar?
I agree Jackie was totally self aware, I've heard she COULD have been a more literary writer and perhaps was under a super secret pen name there are apparently rumours.
Lace was ruined by the mini series who changed who her mother was - that was the whole bloody point!
Flowers in the attic and the other ORIGINAL Virginia Andrews I loved but I tried one of the ones by her child? But under "her" name? Dreadful!
More disturbingly it was my mother got me started on them at 13 with "my sweet audrina" NOT suitable for a 13 year old!!
Virginia Andrews is questionable though, it was all incest and very weird.
What's even weirder is that "flowers" was based on a true case of 2 pubescent children discovered that were being held captive akin to the situation with Joseph Fritzl and similar there was a 3rd child discovered who was initially thought to be a 3rd sibling but turned out to be the elder 2 siblings child
I'm now wanting to know what is wrong with Tolkien if you are a linguist?
Please?!
Linguistics lecturers are fucking obsessed with him! So as a student you end up OVER studying the damn things! Impossible to enjoy anything you've been forced to thoroughly deconstruct.
Sorry but I still love wuthering heights 
@BloodyFreezingOutHere I went through a phase of reading Catherine Cookson but they're ultimately all the same very formulaic
One series I ALWAYS thought were crap were "a woman of substance" and the follow ups, dreadful writing with literally PAGES describing the fucking upholstery! The one time the adaptation was MILES better than the books!
My Paul Zindel books also were terrible, when I remember adoring them as a teen.
Omg! Flashback! Pigman! 
@CurlyhairedAssassin Excellent post
yesterday 1733, context inc historical is key
My dd is now studying literature (having spent the best part of her teen years denying being anything like me
) and we are having some very interesting discussions about her reading list
I can still remember getting a
look myself when a lecturer spotted me reading Marian Keyes in the canteen, to which I asked "have you read anything of hers?" And of course they hadn't - a lit lecturer LITERALLY judging a book by its cover, I was reading Rachel's holiday which is about an addicts road to recovery inc exploring the dysfunction of their family of origin, he'd just assumed it was "chick lit" romance novel