Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

What would you look like left to nature/200 years ago.

113 replies

Coldemort · 09/11/2020 18:23

Lockdown boredom musings....

Without medical/cosmetic interference what would you now look like?
I'm nearly 40.

I had dental treatment for 4 missing teeth so would have huge gaps in my front teeth.
I've terrible eyesight so without contacts/glasses I'd walk around with a permanent squint and I'd imagine terrible crows feet.
My hair is an uninspiring brown, wouldn't look too different but wouldn't have my highlights.
Body hair..... good god youd be able to plait it. Same with eyebrows. and mostache
I've had a bit of botox so more wrinkly.
I have a skin condition which causes abscesses so without surgical treatment I'd have huge boils/abscesses all down my thighs.
Oh - had a tooth abscess as well so possibly might have lost my teeth by now.
Wouldn't have ears pierced.

So toothless, boily, hairy and squinty! Lush!

OP posts:
LaurieFairyCake · 09/11/2020 18:54

Well, dead obviously

1400spincycle · 09/11/2020 18:55

Mid industrial revolution @Daydreamsinglorioustechnicolor. It started around 1780... although would have depended where in the country you were.

Coldemort · 09/11/2020 18:55

@Daydreamsinglorioustechnicolor

200 years ago was 1820, was that pre industrial revolution then? My history is bad.
Just coming to end of industrial revolution. Maybe should have said 500 years ago!
OP posts:

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

gradetoolisted · 09/11/2020 18:56

Dead after a difficult birth

LunaNorth · 09/11/2020 18:57

Snagged toothed with a severe underbite.

Faded ginger hair - I guess a warmish light brown with grey around the temples.

Crows’ feet and number elevens.

Hair would be even frizzier and wilder than it already is.

LunaNorth · 09/11/2020 18:58

Oh, I thought we were just doing beauty stuff.

I’d be dead then. I’d have died in childbirth at the age of 24.

Afwan · 09/11/2020 19:00

If by some miracle I made it past by 2nd birthday and got to adulthood, I'd have incredibly frizzy hair and be 3 stone lighter at least, due to crisps not being invented yet.

Coldemort · 09/11/2020 19:02

@LunaNorth

Oh, I thought we were just doing beauty stuff.

I’d be dead then. I’d have died in childbirth at the age of 24.

I did mean beauty stuff. Dont mind the derailment though!
OP posts:
CloudyVanilla · 09/11/2020 19:02

I sound very arrogant Blush but for the most part I'd be okay. I like my facial features and hair colour, my hair grows well so it would be long and thick. Teeth are straight. Body hair quite fine.

BUT. I have very fair skin with rosacea. My skin looks rough dry and ruddy without due care. It just can't look after itself well. It turns into normalish skin in summer but most if the year it neds extensive management to not be dry and gammony. It can't exfoliate itself well and also doesn't produce any natural moisture. Same with hair actually. Grows great and is fine and thick but i literally forgot what it looks like without being well conditioned - it would be much frizzier I imagine!

MrsSpringfield · 09/11/2020 19:03

Probably would be thinner. Less junk food (not that I'm overweight). Less sugar so possibly better teeth? Or much worse with no toothpaste.
Rough dull skin from the smokey, polluted air. Older looking hands from manual work / housework.

I'm 30 and have two kids. Would I have had many more in those days (lack of contraception), probably, so I guess aesthetically my lady bits might be worse!

NomDePrune · 09/11/2020 19:05

Without vaccinations, probably dead from meningitis or smallpox...

ANoTail · 09/11/2020 19:05

Quite similar to now.
Teeth maybe a bit wonkier and I couldn't have my contact lenses.
I'd probably be thinner, though. Every cloud.

7Days · 09/11/2020 19:06

I'd be bones in the churchyard by now.

So much slimmer

Enb76 · 09/11/2020 19:06

200 years ago is 1820, it’s not that long ago.

doctorhamster · 09/11/2020 19:08

If have a very full and impressive goatee. Thank you PCOS.

Echobelly · 09/11/2020 19:08

I'd be a 'cripple' on account of my congenital hip dysplasia - in fact I would have been if I'd been born even one generation earlier. I was lucky my parents lived where there was a very good paediatric osteo surgeon who had just invented a new new method of dealing with complicated dysplasias like mine (which was found very late, as no one believed my mum that something was wrong, even though I was her third child!) - now I just have a slightly dodgy leg and poor joint mobility, but no general mobility issues.

ANoTail · 09/11/2020 19:09

Although, coming from a Catholic (Catholic and incredibly fertile, the magic combination) family, I shudder to think how many children I'd be on.
It could be 6-8 kids. It might be 16-18. God.

Rebeccasmoonnecklace · 09/11/2020 19:09

I’d probably be an attraction in a circus during those times with the beard I could grow without today’s methods of removal BlushBlush

Duckwit · 09/11/2020 19:09

I would be grey so would look really old! But apart from that I don't think I would look that different.

It's moot really though as I would be dead from cancer by now anyway!

Dontforgetyourbrolly · 09/11/2020 19:10

Crooked teeth and very grey !

GreeboIsMySpiritAnimal · 09/11/2020 19:15

Like the OP I'm terribly shortsighted, shortsighted enough to cause me real problems with correction, actually, so yes to squinting and probably quite bashed and bruised from waking into stuff.

I have naturally good teeth, so even without toothpaste and dental appointments they'd probably be better than most. I'm not especially hairy, and I don't dye my hair or wear a lot of make up.

I reckon I'd look ok, but wouldn't know if I didn't as I wouldn't be able to see myself anyway.

beela · 09/11/2020 19:16

My curly hair would be a frizzy mess. Unless I was rich - can I be rich? Then it would be tumbling ringlets that would be the envy of society.

Except I would have died from pre-eclampsia ten years ago.

Namethief · 09/11/2020 19:22

I would be pretty much unable to see a thing (need a strong prescription) with a huge overbite.

NancysDream · 09/11/2020 19:23

I'd have died more times than I can count... otherwise crap teeth (though that's true anyway, especially this year with my dentist shutting for lockdown and then for emergencies only). Lots of dental issues means dead. I'd be slimmer. Untreated medical conditions would be the cause. So dead. Have more kids. Die in child birth (the first time and subsequent times too!). Also crazy and a drunk without modern interventions (even with those it's been a battle!). Again dead. Dead dead deader and more dead 😂

Coldemort · 09/11/2020 19:24

@beela

My curly hair would be a frizzy mess. Unless I was rich - can I be rich? Then it would be tumbling ringlets that would be the envy of society.

Except I would have died from pre-eclampsia ten years ago.

Ah but remember little women when they created the ringlets with a poker and it burnt and fell out.... think I'd rather have temperature controlled tongs!
OP posts: