Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Would you do this?

18 replies

OhToBeASeahorse · 08/11/2020 18:03

Assuming all lockdowns end etc...

Would you do a 400 mile journey with a just over 2 year old and a 10 week old baby?

I've deliberately kept everything else out just to boil it down to the key info!

OP posts:
dappledsunshine · 08/11/2020 18:07

No not unless it was really really essential (life or death essential).

But then I'm a homebody and wouldn't want to do that journey with my now 16 and 11 year old dc 😝

IceCreamAndCandyfloss · 08/11/2020 18:11

No, too long no for them to be in car seats. It would have to be for something really serious where absolutely no babysitting options.

user1493413286 · 08/11/2020 18:13

Not unless it was absolutely essential and I’m struggling to think of many reasons; maybe for a dying relative to meet the baby but other than that I’d leave DC with someone if I desperately needed to go somewhere or at least leave the 2 year old if breastfeeding but the amount of stops for a baby on a journey like that in a car would be awful and a lot of fuss on public transport.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

PurpleDaisies · 08/11/2020 18:13

It totally depends on the reason. Without that, it’s impossible to say.

formerbabe · 08/11/2020 18:14

No unless absolutely essential

Sunnydaysstillhere · 08/11/2020 18:14

Nope. If you are planning a family visit I would remind them the road goes both ways...
I am all for have child - will travel but that's a head fuck imo..

OhToBeASeahorse · 08/11/2020 18:14

It would be to visit family who can travel themselves

OP posts:
MummyDummyNow · 08/11/2020 18:15

As everyone else has said, only if it's a life/death situation. That's such a long way for such young children to travel.

Sunnydaysstillhere · 08/11/2020 18:16

Say you will have the kettle on then...
Grin

maddy68 · 08/11/2020 18:17

Yes. And did it regularly for a long time

VimFuego101 · 08/11/2020 18:17

That's way too long for a tiny baby to be in a car seat, so not unless life and death. And if the baby was only 10 weeks old you may not even be fully recovered from birth by then.

OhToBeASeahorse · 08/11/2020 19:21

Great, thanks confirmed my thoughts!

OP posts:
OrigamiOwl · 08/11/2020 19:41

@PurpleDaisies

It totally depends on the reason. Without that, it’s impossible to say.
I agree with this. Generally I'd say no, but if it was live or death then yes.
Weneedmusicandtheatre · 08/11/2020 20:00

I would. I did and so did my siblings with their DC. You just plan stops and breaks. People travel this sort of distance all the time.

Elvesinquarantine · 08/11/2020 20:57

Beware if you agree to this you will set a precedent for always travelling...

CatsOutOfTheBag · 08/11/2020 21:03

no way!

Cherrysoup · 08/11/2020 21:05

Isn’t there a limit on how long a baby is supposed to be in a car seat? God, no, especially if the relative can travel.

ParisianLady · 08/11/2020 21:09

I regularly drive further than this with 3 kids on my own, but no way would I do this with a 10 week old.

You'd have to stop so frequently for feeds and removal from car seat, never mind how you might be feeling after the birth.

Could you fly instead? I did this instead of drive when I had tiny ones, much easier, even with a toddler.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page