Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

2 good candidates - which would you pick?

45 replies

1stV45 · 05/11/2020 18:48

I can't say what the job is because it's a bit niche and it would be awful if the candidates recognised themselves but it's a low level management position requiring some practical skills but no formal qualifications.

Candidate 1 : Many years experience in many different but related fields as well as experience of the same job elsewhere. Sensible reason for leaving but no great desire for this company. Adequate answers at interview but nothing special. On another day he would probably have done enough to get the job and would be "Ok" in post. A safe choice.

Candidate 2: Very young, much younger than the people usually in this role, who tend to be approaching middle age. Varied work experience, including having been promoted to a management role in a PT job whilst still at school. He's been doing a junior role in the same field and whilst hasn't worked at this level has a very good understanding of what's required. Came to interview incredibly well prepared and did well on the written task, which I actually thought was too hard. Really excited about the job, some other interests and skills that could enable him to contribute much more widely than the job description. I think I could help him develop into a real asset, although there is undoubtedly work to do there.

Having written it down, I think I've made my decision but the younger man would be a risk. Would you go for it?

OP posts:
Marchmarch · 05/11/2020 19:03

Safe choice.

BernadetteRostankowskiWolowitz · 05/11/2020 19:04

Candidate2. Get them into some sort of formal qual as well, while they are keen.

Teaching someone new habits is easier than trying to change embedded ones.

OrangeGinLemonFanta · 05/11/2020 19:05

Candidate 2 really wants the job, was very well prepared and shows great potential. I'd give it to them.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

PriceEmUp · 05/11/2020 19:06

Not trump.

soundsystem · 05/11/2020 19:06

Yep, candidate 2. Someone you can train up and develop and teach good habits to! Also someone who will be a real ambassador for your organisation and potentially inspire others.

Snowbeau · 05/11/2020 19:08

Candidate 2

78percentLindt · 05/11/2020 19:13

Candidate 2, without a doubt. You can develop his skills.
How did you score them ?

EatPrayYoga · 05/11/2020 19:15

2

Sounds like the better candidate

It would be frustrating to pick the "safe" candidate and then she could leave or it not work out anyway

Ietthemeatcake · 05/11/2020 19:18

My mantra when interviewing is "recruit for attitude, train for skills".

KeeOe · 05/11/2020 19:18

Number 2 without a doubt!

Timeandtune · 05/11/2020 19:21

Did you have a proper scoring system for your interview? Same questions to both candidates based on person spec?
If they both scored equally could you do second interviews ?

altiara · 05/11/2020 19:23

Number 2. Prepared better for the interview. Performed better at interview. Excited about the role. Is a ‘talent’ with room for development. Sounds exactly like the type of person you need to attract to your (well any) company.

CormoranStrikesANoteofDoom · 05/11/2020 19:27

Candidate two sounds amazing - take him.

1stV45 · 05/11/2020 19:30

We do have a scoring system. I haven't added it up yet. I suspect based only on the actual words in the answers the older man wins but that doesn't account for enthusiasm and potential.

OP posts:
whoareyouIwonder · 05/11/2020 19:36

Why on earth would you employ someone who quite clearly doesn't want to work for you?

If they can't even be bothered to put effort into the interview, then what will they be like day to day

vixb1 · 05/11/2020 19:36

As a HR professional.... you need to score it up, so that if you are challenged afterwards you can defend your choice.

If it isn't candidate two, then the scoring criteria isn't the right one Wink

Timeandtune · 05/11/2020 19:39

Add up the scores for goodness sake.

1stV45 · 05/11/2020 19:41

I've got one more to interview so this is idle musing atm. That's why I haven't done the scores, I usually do them altogether at the end to ensure consistency.

OP posts:
Rhubardandcustard · 05/11/2020 19:44

Candidate 2

Kissthepastrychef · 05/11/2020 19:45

Sounds like you are being a bit ageist to me. "He's very young" and you think, just because the other bloke is older, he'd be a safe pair of hands. Potentially will bring nothing to the role other than just fill it. Why should candidate a be preferred just because he fits in with the rest ?

Absolute no brained for me

EasttoWest · 05/11/2020 19:47

candidate 2.

But have you got their feedback yet? Think it’s important to get that - have you fed back to candidate one about their enthusiasm for the company not being there? Give them a chance to answer back. Useful if you’re using a recruiter harder if direct

OhTheRoses · 05/11/2020 19:48

Another HR professional here. Score it. I always weight the test more highly.

Ihatemyseleffordoingthis · 05/11/2020 19:53

Team fit is the clincher for me every time.
Who will work best with people already in post?

Mrswalliams1 · 05/11/2020 19:54

I would discount no.1. I would be interested in no.2 but do you have the time to spend training and nurturing them? They sound very inexperienced so would take a lot of time and effort. If not then re advertise.

1stV45 · 05/11/2020 19:57

Yes, I have the time. I appointed another inexperience manager a couple of years ago who has worked out brilliantly and is now starting to take on aspects of my role. I just have to mention I need to do something and it's done. I could do with more to do Smile

OP posts: