Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

A quick maths question

13 replies

ClaudiaWankleman · 09/07/2020 11:44

I'm trying to do this calculation on my phone and it just isn't working for me - can someone give me an answer (and possible a formula to work this out in the future?)

If I have 10 people doing activities, and would like everyone to work with everyone else in a 2 person partnership, what is the fewest amount of activities required to be scheduled?

OP posts:
xsquared · 09/07/2020 11:56

I'm not sure whether I've understood your question, but are you asking how many pairs you can have if everyone has to work with someone different at least once for this event?

ChangeThePassword · 09/07/2020 12:00

Each person needs to work with 9 other people - so nine?

Or am I misunderstanding you.

ClaudiaWankleman · 09/07/2020 12:00

Yes sorry - I read that back and I didn't explain well.

I want to organise various 'activity stations' and have each attendee work with every other attendee once. If there are 10 people attending, how many activities do I need?

OP posts:
ChangeThePassword · 09/07/2020 12:00

That's if you don't want anyone to repeat an activity.

WiseOwl69 · 09/07/2020 12:08

45 activities.

The first person has to do 9 activities so they do something with everyone. The next person 8 (as they’ve already done one with the first person). Then 7, 6, 5 and so on.

So the maths is:

9+8+7+6+5+4+3+2+1=45

Or...

(9x10)/2 = 45

xsquared · 09/07/2020 12:09

Wiseowl has got it. Just use the triangular number formula n(n+1)/2 to find the number of pairs for n people.

ChangeThePassword · 09/07/2020 12:11

But that's not 45 different activities, that's 9 activities over 5 sessions.

So 9.

ChangeThePassword · 09/07/2020 12:11

Not over 5 sessions, but with 5 groups of two people.

ClaudiaWankleman · 09/07/2020 12:27

Thanks all.

I had worked out the 45 but I knew it was combinations, not actual activities.

The number of actual activities required should always be one less than the number of participants I have (right)?

OP posts:
ChangeThePassword · 09/07/2020 12:33

Yes, unless you are happy for people to repeat activities.

PatriciaHolm · 09/07/2020 12:47

@WiseOwl69

45 activities.

The first person has to do 9 activities so they do something with everyone. The next person 8 (as they’ve already done one with the first person). Then 7, 6, 5 and so on.

So the maths is:

9+8+7+6+5+4+3+2+1=45

Or...

(9x10)/2 = 45

That's individual activity events; if you are setting up stalls and having everyone work at one at a time, so everyone working simultaneously, then move round, you would need at 5 (and everyone people will do at least one activity twice). But you will need 9 "rounds" of activities to get everyone done.
BarbaraofSeville · 09/07/2020 12:56

Do you want each pair to do the same activity repeatedly or do a range of activities and work with different people? Because I think that matters to the answer and how many stations you need.

Eg person 1 plays cards. They play cards with persons 2 to 10. Do you also want person 2 to play cards with person 3 etc, or do you want person 2 to play dominos with persons 1 and 3 to 10?

I think the answer is 5 or 9, but I've already deleted one post trying to explain why, because it got really complicated.

TeenPlusTwenties · 09/07/2020 13:04

As you have worded the question it would be 1 activity, and then 45 repeats of it.

As I think you want it, it is probably 9 as each person needs to work with 9 others, and I think you want them to not repeat activities. (I say think as I haven't checked you could achieve this perfectly with no one having to wait around.)

(Or, you could have 45 activities, so each activity is only done once.)

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread