Question for my mum, really. She loves Reebok Classics and always buys the adult size. She has very small feet (EU 36). I told her she should buy the kids' size as they are considerably cheaper. The UK 3.5 in adult version has the exact same measurements as the UK 4 in the kid version according to the size guide. When she called to check there was no difference, Reebok CS said the 'cut' was different, and the adviser advised buying the adult shoe.
If you have small feet, have you ever bought the kids' size (esp Reebok) and found they are much narrower or anything? My mum has narrow(ish) feet but a bunion - affectionately nicknamed Spud - on one foot that needs to be accommodated.
I'm not sure whether the adviser was not so knowledgeable or there really is a difference? I'm not sure what was meant by 'different cut' ... I mean, surely feet are feet whether on a teen or an adult. She's on a budget and buying the kids' size would save £20, so not to be sniffed at.
Thanks.