I am thinking your problem at the moment is getting the EHCP rather than getting it right (an art form in itself). Also if your boys are having portage then they are very young?
No, we have the proposed plans - one went to panel last week and I’ve heard nothing, emails to chase it up or just ask when I’ll hear have been ignored. The other goes tomorrow.
I’m not holding my breath, they are quite literally useless. Their needs are extensive - they are 38 months and majority of skills for one are birth - 11 months, the other is mainly 8-20 months.
Their needs are documented extensively in the plan - there’s just no specific provisions for 95% of them. There are outcomes with no provision, there are vague provisions with no related outcomes. There are needs with neither - eg extensive sensory needs and outcomes about learning to manage them and no provision whatsoever.
They forgot to request a SALT or nursery report for one twin, and refused to arrange a Vision Support assessment which I now know is mandatory as he has a VI (I’ve arranged one myself which is tomorrow). They refused my request for OT assessments despite the extensive sensory needs.
They’ve lied about taking advice from SENDIASS (which SENDIASS confirmed) in the lack of specific provisions - and they’ve tried to appease me by putting in a sentence saying that school should seek professional advice on frequency of provisions.
SALT made specific recommendations that clearly show he needs specialist provision - which they’ve conveniently left out.
I’m preparing an obscene amount of evidence for our meeting next week. Either the panels agree to a specialist early years setting and I let it go then push for an early review when I have more reports.
Or panel says no to specialist, in which case I tell them I’m going to appeal, at which point I suspect they’ll change their tune (and IPSEA agrees) because the plans are so woeful they can’t possibly defend them.
Have had a rant to our awesome portage worker today so feel slightly better. I know we will get there in the end, it’s just about the time we are losing in the meantime. Their needs are undeniable, so I know we will get there - there are two autism specific early years settings in our area and they should more than qualify for that help.
I’m just furious this is necessary. It’s not even like I’m disagreeing with their assessment of their needs - the needs are all in there, how can you not set provisions for them when that’s the entire bloody point?
I know I’m not alone and that this is absolutely standard, which just makes me more angry. What about the kids whose parents can’t put in this much time and work or who don’t understand the law? Those kids are absolutely screwed and it’s inexcusable.
Argh. Rant over!