Just a couple of points to those on this thread who think the poor have somehow brought this on themselves:
Myth #1: people can't cook wholesome meals properly.
Many people using Foodbanks are housed in temporary accommodation which doesn't have decent cooking facilities. It's very difficult to cook well-balanced meals using only a kettle. Also, for those who do have cooking facilities, these cost money. Gas and electric are vastly more expensive now than they used to be.
Myth #2: poor people have blown their money on luxuries.
Do you honestly think that the majority of users would rather have a new luxury phone than see their children fed? Do you really think people are that evil? It is true that many people have some kind of mobile and/or computer, but that is because life nowadays demands it - do you know how hard it is to claim for benefits and apply for jobs without these things? You can't expect people to have 1950s standards of living but get jobs and pay bills in today's society. Life doesn't work like that.
Myth #3: people are complacent and rely on foodbanks
The majority of foodbanks are there to help people in crisis - they are temporary, and users can only visit a certain number of times before they are referred on to other service providers. And people can't just rock up - they're referred by an agency such as a GP, school, social services etc. There are checks in place.
Visiting a food bank can be humiliating and painful. For many people it feels like they have failed. It is not something anyone does through choice.
Myth #4: the poor have brought this on themselves.
This is a Victorian attitude and society is supposed to have moved on from this. The standard of living has increased so much that people don't have the savings they once had. If you're self employed as a brickie and you break your leg, what do you do? It takes weeks for benefits to kick in. Your parents are dead and you have no family. Who can help you? This is what food banks are for.
Myth #5: these people aren't really hungry. They're not about to die like the people in areas of famine.
No, they're probably not - they probably do have access to clean water, for example. But they are starving. In a supposedly developed country. Isn't that shameful? People are dying from neglect and lack of food in the same town where people shop in Waitrose and go on luxury holidays. Isn't that terrible? Shouldn't everyone have enough to eat, at least? Why is this a race to the bottom?
Society is becoming increasingly stacked against the poor. If you have a good home and heating and food on the table it is because you are lucky. Yes, you may have worked hard for it and foregone luxuries, but many of the people using Foodbanks have also worked hard and forgone luxuries. Life is not fair.
Some of the responses on this thread make me despair. This "it wasn't like that in my day" philosophy is why we're in the mess we're in politically and socially. There are real people living right now in terrible, terrible conditions. Please, stop harping back to some fictitious golden age and open your eyes to what is happening now.