No need to avoid palm oil. It's been a while since it was ok to burn down rainforests and plant African oil palm trees. It's had a lot of focus and sustainable ways of sourcing it have been found. It needs to be grown in topical areas but a lot of farmers living in tropical areas are opting to grow the tree's rather than keep live stock or grow other things as it's financially very viable and all supermarkets etc are rushing to find these sustainable farmers and their trees.
The trees can produce so much more oil than any other type of plant we can get oil from. If people boycott palm oil, deforestation will get worse as you need 3 to 4 times the amount of space to grow sunflowers for example to produce the same amount of oil that one area of the palm oil trees would produce.
It was also Rhinos, elephants and tigers, among other animals being put in danger due to the burning down of rainforests, not just orangutans.
Seriously, don't jump on a bandwagon based on what the media says. It was an issue and still is to a certain degree but much less than it used to be and no supermarket wants to buy palm oil off these dodgy people that burn down parts of rainforests and illegally plant trees. No one does so they've almost stopped doing it, almost. Not because of people boycotting but because farmers in Indonesia, North America, South America and Africa are seeing that they can use their land for these trees and make money. Before it was an almost totally illegal thing where rogues would burn down forests and plant them because no one cared where it came from.
We know now and the problem is not so much of a problem now. There is nothing wrong with palm oil, it was how it was being produced. Only some rogues in the know and benefitting. Buying the products will help to keep the sustainable farmers going and help people like WWF plant more trees in the burnt down rainforests meaning the whole world doesn't need to start growing 2, 3 or even 4 times as much other plants in order to compensate for the loss of palm oil