I’m about to start a new contract in a few weeks and am off work till then. Mostly trying to get some house stuff sorted but also pottering about. I suggested to DH we take the opportunity to go out for lunch here and there. He said yes. Makes sense while children are at school.
This morning I pointed out that two weeks have gone by and we haven’t.
He says I can’t be grumpy with him for not taking time off work because I didn’t take any time off over the last few months when he suggested it. I was working my arse off, was ill for a few weeks and therefore got a bit behind and did not take any time to even go to dentist or have smear etc done. Not once did I even pop down to the supermarket.
He works for himself and takes bits of time off here and there to go for a walk or pop to short hobby event things. Pokemon catching.
But despite me not being able to take time off, he says it’s the same. I don’t care that much about spending the time with him but I just can’t work out how he can’t see the difference. Or is there none? Is it me?
I know this is really minor, I’m not making a massive deal out of it, I just want to understand his logic. Because to me, there isn’t any.