I had my brows microbladed last July because after years of plucking them, they just stopped growing. At first they looked great, I could see each individual 'hair' drawn on perfectly and they looked natural. You have to follow the aftercare for the following week with the special wipes until they scab and flake off. After about 6 weeks you go back again for a top up, so the microblader can fill in any bits she may have missed and also to go over the exisiting hairs. Same aftercare follows and then you're supposed to have natural looking brows without the need to draw them on. I don't know if I just expected too much from it all (cost was £250 by the way) but I still have to pencil them in when I put make up on, and today I was looking at them in my 15x mirror and I cannot see any individual hairs at all. It looks more like just a smudged blur, similar to as if I'd pencilled them in then wiped it off slightly.
I'm wondering if perhaps I have the type of skin that doesn't respond as well as someone else's might do.
I did contact the lady who did them and she had me go back so she could check....she didn't think they were as bad as I do, and actually she gave me a further top up for free, however despite that I'm still wondering if my expectations were too high.
Has anyone else had it done and did it work for you?