Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Can someone explain this equation (from facebook)?

18 replies

NotComingBackAnytimeSoon · 25/03/2019 07:43

I'm would say the answer to d is 13 and b and c are incorrect. But clearly I'm missing something. Anyone care to explain?

Can someone explain this equation (from facebook)?
OP posts:
OracleofShelf · 25/03/2019 07:46

45? I think it's 1x4,+1 then 2x5+2 and so on.

BloodyBosch · 25/03/2019 07:46

You add the answer to the previous sum.

PurpleDaisies · 25/03/2019 07:46

It shouldn’t have an equals really.

You find the product of the numbers on the left and add the first number so 5 + 8 “=“ 45

SlightAggrandising · 25/03/2019 07:47

Is it something like:

Multiply the second number by the first then add them? Meaning the missing answer is 45?

BloodyBosch · 25/03/2019 07:48

First answer is 5, then add 5 + 2 to that = 12
Next one 12, then add 3 + 6 to that = 21

BloodyBosch · 25/03/2019 07:49

Missing answer is 34

TapasForTwo · 25/03/2019 07:51

I make it 34

Littlebelina · 25/03/2019 07:54

As bloody says you add the answer to the previous sum so the answer could be 34 (21+13). However there is potentially a line missing (4+7) and if so the answer would be 21 +11+13 (45).

In reality all these Facebook maths puzzles are deliberately vague to trick you to putting your answer down (and arguments) in the comments to a post that someone has shared from a random page. Once you have commented the page might be able to harvest data about you (depending on your privacy settings). So just don't comment.

See also "bet you can't name a city without an A in it" posts

NoIsACompleteAnswerSometimes · 25/03/2019 07:58

I got 45. 5 x 8 (+ 5).
All of the previous equations work on this basis, i.e. 3 x 6 (+3) = 21

TapasForTwo · 25/03/2019 07:59

Yes, someone advised me recently not to answer these types of posts because of data harvesting.

TakenForSlanted · 25/03/2019 07:59

I also come up with 45, as follows:

Actual calculation is 1st number * 2nd + 1st = result

Hence:
14+1 = 5
2
5+2 = 12
36+3 = 21
5
8+4 = 45

Having said that, there may be other patterns that work, too. Interestingly, the 1st column of numbers appears to be the fibonacci sequence (minus the duplicate 1 in the beginning).

Magissa · 25/03/2019 07:59

34?

NotComingBackAnytimeSoon · 25/03/2019 08:15

I didn't realise that about the data harvesting, but I never answer them anyway. I just annoyed me as I didn't spot it immediately, I'm feeling ill and really couldnt be arsed to think about it! Thank you all.

The one about the city without an a is plain stupid! If someone asked me to name a city I'd say London, and that doesn't have an a. It's not exactly tricky!

OP posts:
TapasForTwo · 25/03/2019 08:25

We should have a thread about these kind of things on MN so we can answer the questions without risk of data harvesting.

Sheffield

Lweji · 25/03/2019 08:49

34

But I find these things stupid because the numbers don't add.
Working out a sequence of numbers is one thing (it's in all IQ tests), but working out sums that give numbers other than their true results is inane.

Btw, it's not difficult to think of words without a letter. The trick is that you end up focusing on that letter and it becomes more difficult.

BarbaraofSevillle · 25/03/2019 10:34

I also get 34, but didn't know that the point of these is data harvesting.

I did wonder, because some of the questions like 'name a city with (or without) an A' are obviously so ridiculously easy, but I thought the point was to make stupid people feel clever, ie they would think that they are one of the few who could pass the test.

Drogosnextwife · 25/03/2019 10:40

It's 34. I don't understand why it's set out the way it is.

Littlebelina · 25/03/2019 11:02

I was looking into this a bit more after posting and can't find anything definite about data harvesting (although I'm sure I've read that before) but "like farming" is another explanation. www.itgovernance.co.uk/blog/like-farming-and-share-scams-whats-it-all-about basically boosting traffic to a page so it becomes popular and then can be used for spamming feeds.

Either way I make a rule not to comment on posts unless I trust the source page

New posts on this thread. Refresh page