I would like some point of views as H and I seem to have complete oppostive view on this subject.
Dc1 is 15yo. They have been selected for a sport event in France. They are going with the team. Two options are possible
1- driving them down to London to a meeting point where most of the team will board on a bus. Bus will take them to the location in France. And then bring them back. The drive to London is several hours. Meeting up for the start of the journey is a very early start (5.00am) so it means going down the day before and staying in a hotel. H agreed he was happy to do it when we first learnt about it and said Yes for dc1 to go.
2- two people who are living closer to us are going down by train and will stay in a hotel near Dover where they will meet up with the rest of team/bus. These two people are proposing to ‘take dc1’ with them. This would mean two trains before arriving in Dover and a stay in a hotel there before meeting the bus. We (H, me or dc1) have never met them before. Dc1 has never travelled in his own. They would have to be in different carriages in the trains (the two people have already booked their tickets) and of course dc1 would on his own in the hotel.
H thinks option 2 is OK and that dc1 would manage regardless. I think he is quite keen in avoiding the drive.
I think option 1- is better but I am told I’m just overprotective and they are mature enough to handle it.
What do you think?