Why have the public turn agsinst Meghan?

[WasWats]

I really do not understand why.

Well I haven't. I don't really think about her at all.

Whatever remarks are made in the press go unread by me - I make a point of not reading that sort of gutter journalism.

No-one has turned against her @WasWats That is just what some people hope for, but it's not gonna happen.

It's just a few bitter and spiteful people who dislike her, and the vile press are against her for a number of reasons. One very obvious one.

I like her and so does everyone I have spoken to. Then again, we are happy with our lives, our relationships, and our families, so we have no reason to be jealous and bitter. Not like some.............

The gutter 'press' are writing nasty misogynistic crap about her because she's a woman and she's not white. They are turds.

Good old fashioned racism. And she's American so clearly not good enough for The Royal Family. She never will be. Hopefully they have the good sense to call the press out on their treatment of her again.

I don't know anyone in real life that dislikes Meghan. In fact, most people I know prefer her over the other royals.

The Daily Mail's obsession with her is creepy and bizarre. They would never do this to a bloke. Piers Morgan is pondlife, and his opinion is irrelevant to me.

I hope for Meghan's sake that her baby is a boy.

Not everyone liked her to begin with, I personally thought her choices around eugenie's wedding were poor. Wearing an oversized coat unlike anything she had worn before to cover an unidentifiable bump seemed very a very calculated way to attract attention, especially as since then she's been back to her usual skin tight outfits.

The gutter 'press' are writing nasty misogynistic crap about her because she's a woman and she's not white. They are turds.

My point is that the DM isn't behind my reasons for not being a fan, I also think they should leave her alone

It's a "the daily fail" & their re-run of "Mrs Wallis-Simpson & Edward VIII".

Wearing an oversized coat unlike anything she had worn before to cover an unidentifiable bump seemed very a very calculated way to attract attention, especially as since then she's been back to her usual skin tight outfits.

I think it's more likely she tried to hide her stomach to not take attention off the bride. However she couldn't win as then she gets accused of shit like this by people like you. If she would have worn a tighter outfit and there was a slight hint of a baby bump, she would also have been called an attention seeker.

I have no idea what any of them are like but the constant daily mail stories are just awful. I think they should be left alone, it's not fair on them.

I think Harry and William both seem nice. I can't imagine either of them marrying horrible women. I'm sure they have their issues, like any family but I don't think this daily mail shite is in the public interest. I would have though the media and the public would know better than to do this after past events.

I don't think the public has I think the Daily mail has. They like to build people up & then pull them down. Gives them something to write lots of crap articles about. All the better if they can pitch two women against each other.