Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

2 under 2?

34 replies

doingbetter · 09/02/2017 16:38

Looking for some advice. Currently have 1 dc who is 8 months. We are thinking about trying for a second asap, so I would possibly have 2 under 2 by my own choice. I have no support (family or friends) other than my partner who works full-time. I would have the option of putting the first into childcare for at least half a day as soon as they are 1. Am I being ridiculous thinking I can manage with 2 under 2? Or should I give myself (and my body!) more time? Im early 30's but don't want to wait too long as have some small fertility niggles and although I am currently only thinking of having two children I would like to at least have the option to have more if I changed my mind.
So wwyd, would you go ahead with trying for a second or would you wait?

TIA Smile

OP posts:
Jooni · 09/02/2017 17:47

There are pluses and minuses to every age gap. You would cope fine I'm sure because you'd have to! Like a lot of things in life.

I haven't got 2 under 2 yet but will have when DC2 arrives in June. We wanted to condense the financially tight baby years as much as possible. But I can see the benefits of waiting as well. Do whatever you think is best for your family.

NickyEds · 09/02/2017 17:52

I have a 19 month gap and love it. First 6 months were hard (no family help, no nursery/childcare)but now they're 19 months and 3 it's great!

Love51 · 09/02/2017 17:54

When I went back to work after #2 I was paying 2x full fees. No funded hours. Luckily I had savings, and only worked 2.5 days. But it's financially harder than you might anticipate.
I really enjoyed the second mat leave, seeing loads of #1. Now she's in school, I miss her on my days off work!

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

weegiemum · 09/02/2017 18:08

i had 2 almost exactly 2 years apart (1 year, 11 months and 28 days!!), but then another 22 months later, so 3 under 4. I was also very ill with pg3 and afterwards, had dh working full time + on calls and no family close by (though mil was great at coming to help when she could).

It was hard, hard going but ultimately worth it, though I did have pnd. It got the baby stages out of the way all at once, and we did some crazy things when they were tiny, including a holiday in Central America where we went backpacking - with dd2 actually in a backpack on me and everything else in dh's pack!

I used free hours at the local nursery as the got older and had a mothers help, who came twice a week to do housework, look after the dc and give me a break, usually to sleep!

Now they're huge teenagers, 17, 15 and 13, are either best friends or worst enemies - pretty much like when they were toddlers! I'm glad I had them close together.

eddiemairswife · 09/02/2017 18:15

I managed it fine. No parents or in-laws within 100 miles and husband teaching. 15 months apart, so eldest still had 2 decent naps a days, and youngest fed well and slept between feeds. I had never been a particularly maternal type, but did want several children. Went on to have 2 more before the eldest was 6.
Reading people's experiences on here I realised how lucky I have been. All fed well and slept 3 to 4 hours between feeds from birth, so no sleep deprivation. And cloth nappies and no washing machine until pregnant with 3rd.

frogsgoladidahdidah · 09/02/2017 18:44

I had two under two. Loved it so, I did it again 3 years later!

(We are very tired, the house is a mess BUT we are very happy!)

doingbetter · 09/02/2017 19:31

My partner is very supportive, so I would at least have that. However his hours are long so I can really only count on that support at the weekends. Twins had not crossed my mind!! But that would be a game changer for sure…I'm glad I posted now- lots of food for thought! I reckon we could manage it and still be together by the end of it... Grin
I love the fact that pp said they travelled with theirs. I would love to do something similar but not sure I have the guts..

OP posts:
Gildedcage · 09/02/2017 19:43

I had 3 under 4. It's been great. Totally great. It seemed easier for me than people who had bigger gaps. There are pros and cons of course. But I loved it and I'm so glad we did it this way. Whatever you decide will be hard work.

IndigoSister · 09/02/2017 20:09

I did 2 under 2 on purpose (17 months apart). Living in a foreign country so no family support. DS1 also has special needs. It was completely manic but we did it and they are both really close (now teens). Both myself & DH worked full time, I had 3 months maternity leave. I was 31 when I had DS1.

I was always of the mindset that if I was doing 1 nappy then I may as well be doing 2. It truly was manic and I look back now and wonder how we did it but we also had loads of fun.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page