Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

to go to LA or not?

4 replies

elportodelgato · 15/04/2011 20:41

The scenario is:

An old friend of DH's lives in LA and is getting married out there this year - he has just confirmed the date of the wedding for late in July (which is about 4 months earlier than he had told us previously). We have 2 DDs aged 2.9 and 3mo. By the time of the wedding, DD1 will be 3.1 and DD2 will be 7mo. Originally when we thought the wedding would be in October we were planning on leaving the kids with my parents so we could go there without them for 5 days or so and have a great fun break together - have a bit of a blow-out. However, DD2 will only be 7mo in July and I am a bit anxious about leaving her for such a long time. DD1 is very used to staying with the gps on her own so I am not too concerned about her. There is also the question of the cost which is pretty significant! We're just trying to work out if we can / should try to go to this wedding. I think our options are:

  1. Leave the DDs with the gps and go just the two of us
  2. Leave DD1 with the gps and take DD2 with us
  3. Take both the DDs with us and turn it into a bigger / longer holiday in the US (although the thought of the long flight with them is not AT ALL tempting and the timing is not ideal for DH to take a big block of holiday from work)
  4. DH to go on his own (which will drive me mad with envy and which won't be as much fun for him)
  5. Don't go at all

Any ideas? I think I know that we have to do option 5 but I am so so keen to get away. WWYD?

OP posts:
MollieO · 15/04/2011 20:45

Is it a child friendly wedding? The only US weddings I've been to a very formal evening ones where young children definitely weren't welcome. Personally I don't think it would be fair to take your baby and leave your 3 yr old with GPs. I'd either take both or leave both.

CrystalQueen · 15/04/2011 20:48

Well I was just in LA (for work) and I thought it was nothing special, depends on the area of course. Is the wedding in Beverly Hills or Compton?!

There was a couple on the plane with two toddlers and a baby which I thought was very brave, but they were well behaved (or at least quiet). There is no way I would consider taking DD (2.6) on such a long journey, I found it bad enough myself. The jet lag for such a short trip is a nightmare (we were there for a week and had just got over it when it was time to get back).

elportodelgato · 15/04/2011 20:59

MollieO, I have no idea how child friendly it will be tbh, but for the evening function at least I guess one of us would be back at the hotel babysitting :-(

Crystal, the wedding is in Marina del Rey and the jetlag is also a consideration definitely

OP posts:

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

caramelwaffle · 15/04/2011 21:51

Very first reaction - have the Grandparents look after the children and go to LA, just the two of you.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page