@Tempname1234567 Hi, I’ve only just seen your thread this morning, do you mind if I ask a question? It might be slightly adjacent to your area of expertise, but I have always wondered, so will give it a go:
Am i correct in thinking that a standard repayment mortgage still has the interest component front-loaded - so in the earlier years of a mortgage the borrower will be paying mainly interest, and very little of the mortgage payments goes towards the capital, and that over the term (25 years), this gradually shifts si that at the end of the term each monthly payment is mainly capital?
Or is there now an even split - (interest v capital) from day one?
If the mortgage payments are front-loaded to pay down the interest first, doesn’t that then mean that after the end of a fixed term, the borrower will have paid a huge amount of interest, but only a small portion of capital? So the system of having short-term fixes is not actually in the best interests of the borrower? But is massively in the best interests of the lender (as they get proportionally much larger interest payments over the fix period, than they should be) - which surely means that the effective rate over the fix period is much much higher than the headline rate offered?
I have never seen this discussed anywhere - but I remember (on our mortgage maybe 20 years ago), seeing figures of how much was interest and how much was capital, and being very shocked.
I would be very very keen to hear if this is actually the case still?