This is quite interesting. My teen daughter has quite a lot of sensory issues. School suggested that if she was assessed for autism she’d get support. So we agreed.
I was contacted by someone who introduced herself as an autism nurse who arranged for a trainee autism nurse to ring me for an interview. This lasted about an hour. Completed the questionnaire they sent which really didn’t much relate to my daughter’s issues.
Daughter had a meeting with the nurse for 40 minutes which my daughter described as very bizarre and patronising being asked to do tasks that were more suited to a child half her age. Not once was she asked about her issues.
I received a call from the nurse the following day and was told she had a diagnosis. I did laugh at this as the assessment process seemed so very inadequate. She also told me what school had highlighted- neither my daughter or I recognised what school said about her other than the sensory stuff! Also, school had never raised this with me - only the sensory issues.
Receive the report and my conversation is summarised into two thirds of a page, in which there are eight inaccuracies. Things I had never said! There were three recommendations: one of which was a reasonable adjustment I’d already fought for; one was a pass to get out of class early, which is not something she either needs or wants; and the final one was to contact a really good local charity that supports parents of children with autism - but has nothing appropriate to offer to us!
The whole report including covering letter was three and a half pages long. The whole process seemed so contrived and following a chat with someone from an autism charity, really left me wondering about the validity of the diagnosis. I’d be interested to hear @magictits thoughts?