Wow!
What is it about you that meant that you could do it for 30 years and not burn out?
Hard to say - the right personality type? - being able to see the bigger picture? This isn't work for people who care too much, like I said - sympathy, empathy or whatever you want to call it, too much of that and it'll kill you. You need to be able to use it, but also to be able to turn it off. It isn't a unique quality. Why be a doctor and specialise in oncology? Often times that won't work out well either. You just have to believe that what you are doing will make a difference, even when it doesn't. Small pictures are the losses, big pictures are the wins. Does that make sense?
In an average year how many disasters did you go to and how long were you at each one for?
It depends on where you are needed and for how long. Bear in mind we generally get long "holidays" after a work detail! But seldom more than one a year, unless exceptional circumstances, although that might involve moving around or different field sites. Haiti, for example, was about nine months for me, in two "shifts", but all on one site. Bosnia was nearly two years, but again broken up into "shifts", and this time in different field locations as needed. The shortest were probably the 2004 tsunami, because that was very much about stabilisation and then handing off to longer term solutions; and my last field setting in Nepal's earthquake.
Do you have a “preferred” type of disaster? (I always think war would be harder to deal with than an earthquake for example.)
No. I have never really thought about it like that. But I guess that it's easier to come to terms with what nature does than what people do. Nature acts without malice.
Did you ever refuse to go to any disasters?
No, not as such. Once I was asked "if" I could go into the field, but there were reasons why I needed to be at home for that time. You don't refuse, although I guess it never crossed my mind to. But you aren't forced to go anywhere either. It's more a discussion, and sometimes the outcome of that discussion might be that you aren't the best person to be there.
Were you able to have a private life? (Spouse? Kids?) If not - was that a sacrifice you made or something that you didn’t want anyway?
Whew, that's a hard one. I wasn't particularly keen on having children - it was never in the plan, I'm not maternal as such, and I can't abide babies. But yes, I married someone in the same field of work, and ended up as step-mom! But it was perhaps not the most conventional of lives for any of us. My husband died a decade ago, perversely in a car crash in the UK. The kids - one is a doctor and the other a university academic. So I guess you could say yes to the private life, albeit rather unconventional.
How do you avoid the whole “I feel useless” feeling?
I think you mean getting overwhelmed by it? You don't have it in the first place. You count what you've achieved, not what you haven't. You can't control everything. And being kind of blunt, many of the professions and character types involved - well, we know we're good! You know how, no matter how good your doctor may be, the best of them are also a little arrogant? I guess that's one of the qualities that many of us have, whatever the profession. A bit of arrogance.
Would it be something that someone who worked in logistics could have got involved with? (I was once a mathematician and when I graduated I looked at jobs in actuarial and also logistics. I went for actuarial in the end and have been an actuary for many years. But I do wonder occasionally about working in logistics and what “might have been”.)
Yes. Absolutely. I was lucky and was good at medicine and logistics (although the latter was a talent I didn't know I had). We get quite a few ex-military in the logistics area too. Moving quickly, efficiently and without forgetting anything, plus being able to think on your feet if anything goes wrong - every site needs several of those.
Were there a lot of relationships between the aid workers and was that discouraged, accepted or encouraged?
I wasn't joking when I said that we were often too tired to think at the end of a day, or night. Aid work is different, longer term, but I think probably the answer is yes there would be relationships. For us, yes some. Some marriages / partnerships like mine. I'd have to opt for the middle choice - accepted. Consenting adults, not the people we work with, well it was no big deal. One of my closest friends was a translator in Bosnia, and married a UN peacekeeping officer. I'd have to say that few people managed to stay in the life and also have a family life - but it wasn't at all unheard of.
Does that answer all your questions?